RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2015, 03:32 PM
LT. Ox's Avatar
LT. Ox LT. Ox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: West Colorado
Posts: 304
Default USA or other Special Ops

Ok, in the 2000 time line;
What would say three A-teams and a B-team, be doing in Germany?
Who has control of Mission assignment?
Who would be responsible for them, gear, vehicles, etc?
Now I need this info for my Grand Son who will just not understand that Grandpa was Airborne Ranger, NOT Special forces.
But then how do you say no to a thirteen year old that has your name?
He is not going to get all those folks but it will help me assign some for his use and maybe make a little sense.
__________________
Tis better to do than to do not.
Tis better to act than react.
Tis better to have a battery of 105's than not.
Tis better to see them afor they see you.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2015, 04:47 PM
FPSlover FPSlover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LT. Ox View Post
Ok, in the 2000 time line;
What would say three A-teams and a B-team, be doing in Germany?
Who has control of Mission assignment?
Who would be responsible for them, gear, vehicles, etc?
Now I need this info for my Grand Son who will just not understand that Grandpa was Airborne Ranger, NOT Special forces.
But then how do you say no to a thirteen year old that has your name?
He is not going to get all those folks but it will help me assign some for his use and maybe make a little sense.
Although I am by no means an expert on this subject compared to almost everyone on the board, I do have a bit of knowledge on this subject. Point by point:

Quote:
Originally Posted by LT. Ox View Post
What would say three A-teams and a B-team, be doing in Germany?
They would be either doing a secret mission of sorts (preparing partisans in case of a WP breakthrough or raiding the enemy for food sources perhaps?), escaping towards Bremerhaven to get to the ships there if the player group is doing the "Going Home" module, providing security for an high ranking officer, official or dignitary going to Bremerhaven, they could of used their training and skills to somehow have set up their own miniature empire within Germany or a hundred other reasons

Quote:
Originally Posted by LT. Ox View Post
Who has control of Mission assignment?
Those that remain would be (at best) Corps level assets (at worst, Army level or Theatre level) due to their experience and training, never mind their near irreplaceablity

Quote:
Originally Posted by LT. Ox View Post
Who would be responsible for them, gear, vehicles, etc?
Since they are Corps level (at best) assets, the person responsible would be G4 or F4, which is the logistics officer the Corps (depending if it is a forward headquarters, thus F4 or the main HQ, in which case it would be a G4.).

Any other questions? I hope this helped. If I got this wrong, can the other board members who have more knowledge of this then me correct me on my mistakes?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2015, 09:09 PM
swaghauler swaghauler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 1,481
Default

Whenever you saw someone "looking official" in Kakis with a polo shirt on; They were either SOCOM or some branch of government identified only by initials. Since they were either above EVERYONE in the field in Authority or completely outside all Military Authority; Being approached by one was a "bad day waiting to happen" for your average grunt.

Last edited by swaghauler; 07-26-2015 at 08:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2015, 09:21 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

In addition to what Swaghauler mentioned...
During the 1990s there was one moderately accurate way to identify some US SOCOM guys... chewing tobacco.
Chewing tobacco never had the same popularity in other parts of the world and when they were in civvies, I was able to spot the US guys amongst Aussie, British and New Zealand special forces types with about 75% accuracy based on who smoked cigarettes and who used chewing tobacco.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2015, 01:47 AM
LT. Ox's Avatar
LT. Ox LT. Ox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: West Colorado
Posts: 304
Default A new method of ID

Chewing tobacco or as we all say here tabacco?
Thanks to all and esp. FPSlover good concise answers and therefore a lot of help.
Hey swaghauler, 'what you mean Average Grunt?" we are all special grunts!
that is what they told me when they needed help.
__________________
Tis better to do than to do not.
Tis better to act than react.
Tis better to have a battery of 105's than not.
Tis better to see them afor they see you.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-2015, 12:57 PM
swaghauler swaghauler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 1,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LT. Ox View Post
Chewing tobacco or as we all say here tabacco?
Thanks to all and esp. FPSlover good concise answers and therefore a lot of help.
Hey swaghauler, 'what you mean Average Grunt?" we are all special grunts!
that is what they told me when they needed help.
Your "average grunt" is one who isn't allowed to say "no" when someone in kakis walks up to you and says..."[insert rank here] I need you to do...."

Last edited by swaghauler; 07-26-2015 at 08:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.