|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Sino-Soviet War: Reasons?
Has anyone done any work or put any real thought into what led up to the war?
Obviously there must have been tensions among the two before the border clash or do people think it was just some guys on the border losing their shit and started firing at one another? In my campaign we have tensions running since early '94 but we havent put alot of thought into the details.
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!" TheDarkProphet |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Iron ore, Timber, coal, silica, tungsten, titanium, diamonds, gold, oil, and water.
Resource rich territories of Mongolia and Siberia. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"I don't know, two toughest kids on the block, I guess. Sooner or later they're gonna fight..."
Colonel Andy Tanner USAF
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Subtle.. I dig the reference.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
As subtle as a hand grenade in a washing machine...
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ah him. I have used a more politically correct version of one of his lines in an article on the Tu-22M.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I found alot of Fanzine stuff about the timeline that seemed to fill in alot of blanks...
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!" TheDarkProphet |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
My guess is that with two countries that control the media and events in a remote area there would be considerable doubt as to the truth. Likely to be tensions building for some time and then bang it all kicks off...
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
And to go further with Paul's comment, the border clashes have often been between border guard units rather than army units and don't seem to draw the same attention from the media compared to "proper" military clashes.
I vaguely recall that various clashes between Chinese and Soviet border guards have resulted in fatalities on both sides on more than one occasion. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I tried to address the motives for the Soviets in my piece on the Sino-Soviet War. Kato put it in an archive file at one point.
__________________
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It was fought over control of several islands on the Amir and Ussuri Rivers; the Chinese gained control of two major islands. There was an on again off again series of "incidents" until 1991 when both sides signed an accord acknowledging Chinese control. During the initial fighting, the Kremlin was so spooked by the threat of Chinese invasion, they alerted their Strategic Rocket Forces, just in case.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
An unusual idea that would fit the 1.0 timeline (and inspired by news today from Korea) - a Russian unit on the Chinese gets orders to prepare to deploy to Afghanistan, he decides to not risk it and tries to escape to Chinese territory, Russian guards fire at him and the CHinese thinking they are under attack return fire, everything escalates as both sides report up the chain that the other side fired first (they may even believe it...). Poor quality reports (made as an excuse to avoid blame) escalate the incident to the level of the 1960s incidents above.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|