|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Gaining Experience, and Skill Progression (v2.2)
As both GM and player, I consider character growth, in terms of abilities and competence, to be a reward/incentive. IMHO, skill improvement in the T2k v2.2 mechanics seems to be an afterthought, at best .
Quote:
Quote:
Another way to improve skill levels through training, but I find the v2.2 rules concerning same to be rather convoluted. How do you handle XP and skill progression in your campaign? -
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have little experience with using XP in my T2k2. After a few tries, I ended up hand-waving it.
Players either didn't track skill use, or "I fired three shots, so that's 3 xp, right?" needed to have it explained to them, again. My tracking it was a pain.{ Some of that may be me crossing memories with v1, though.} In my v2.0 Merc game, their Initiative XP totals shot up rather quickly, such that all of the PCs had 4+ Initiatives, and the opposition was getting gunned down really fast. That got boring to me, at least.
__________________
My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
When I run I have the players place a tick next to any skill they use successfully. At the end of each session I award between 1-5 xp (2-3 being average) and an initiative xp if a potentially PC life threatening combat took place. The players can spend their xp on any skills they have a tick on or save it, but when they spend even a bit they lose all the ticks from their skills.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I haven't run much in regards to T2k, I've barely dabbled in it, but I have run many Merc: 2000 and Dark Conspiracy games since the early 1990s and they both use the same Skill increase system as T2k in either the 2nd Ed. or 2.2 versions.
These have all been face-to-face games and there's never been any problem with tracking XP because most games usually result in 2-3 XP in general for each session plus extra points based on significant/intense actions conducted by the PC, excellent role-playing by the Player, outstanding results achieved by the PC/group and so on. From memory, this pretty much follows the recommendations from the various GDW games as to how much XP to award Typically, most PCs end up with 3-4 XP per session. I actually find this system far easier to track than something like D&D where almost any action the PCs do can result in XP awards and you're constantly updating their XP as the session progresses. Some Referees, require that the PCs have a period of downtime before they can apply XP to a skill and raise it to the next level, some require the XP to be spent on only those skills used during the session, some allow the XP to be used during the session, some award "general" XP to be used as the Player likes and also "specific" XP that must be used on a specific skill. I've seen all of these ideas put into use and used some of them myself but overall, the biggest issue I have ever seen with the GDW XP system, is players of a certain fantasy RPG, thinking that they don't get enough XP. I haven't seen any particular problem with the amount of time it took for people to raise skills but then I typically used the "general XP and specific XP" approach so that after say three sessions, PCs could have accumulated anywhere from 9 to 12 XP and in particularly intense sessions, they may have even gained an extra point (potentially up to 3 extra XP over three sessions) I was running the session once a fortnight so in real time we're talking six weeks for the PCs to gather between 9-12 (and potentially, 15) XP. Obviously if I was running the game once per week it would have taken half that time. My approach suited me and my group. I have heard of other Dark Conspiracy Referees who awarded more XP per session (typically 4-7 points), at the time I didn't think that was necessary but that's what suited them and I can understand why they would choose that approach once their skills got high enough that they needed to bank 7-10 points to raise a single skill. But again, the phrase "your mileage may vary" comes into play, if the PCs are not advancing quite fast enough, then adding a few extra XP per session won't screw things up and if they're advancing too quickly, I found adding a few extra skills into the game caused a further dilution of the XP pool. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
One way of dealing with the D&D mindset may be to explain to them 1 XP in T2K is roughly equal to 100, or even 1,000 in their chosen level based system.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Not a bad idea that... wish I had thought of it several years ago!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|