![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was just wondering, what is the likelyhood of having Q ships in the Twilight World. Much like the WWI vessels that were armed and manned by naval crews, but sailed looking like steamers and sailing vessels of the day. Then when the submarine surfaced, the crew went into action and guns were brought out from colapsing cargo containers and false deckhouses to be trained on the now surfaced and vulnerable submarine.
And in the Twilight world, these could be used to deal with pirates, or even to hide the fact that the vessel is on an armed mission or is just an armed cargo vessel, or that the PCs are on an operation and don't want to be unarmed but they also do not want to draw undue attention to themselves being overtly briming with weapons.
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that Chico and company have the Russians using the old German tactic of disguised commerce raiders. Similar to a Q-Ship, but the prey is different. Instead of being a sub-hunter, the raider hunts for unescorted merchant ships and either sinks or seizes them as prizes and sends them off to a friendly port. Many of the camo tricks (false paint schemes, flying a neutral flag, concealed guns and torpedo tubes, etc.) are the same either way. The Germans sent only nine raiders to sea in WW II, but they sank or captured 890,000 tons of merchant shipping (including victims of raider-laid mines), and one raider, KMS Kormoran, sank an Australian light cruiser as well. The Soviets in the 1950s probably had studied the possiblity of raiders, but nothing of their naval plans for WW III has been released, and given the current Russian leadership, those files aren't going to be released anytime soon.
__________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect, but always have a plan to kill them. Old USMC Adage |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It wont do to start comparing war crimes - it is the war that is the crime. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Targ;
I remember that and was waiting with baited breath. And I am torn. Technicaly, you are right and valid. And I lean towards you that way. But also give credit where credit it due. Did not the kraut crew even with the disadvantage they had <that all pirates have> when they faced the crew of the Syndney? Sadly when naval warfare comes, a major factor is "LUCK" and it does not always go to the victor. However, there is nothing wrong with pulling for your country and your countrymen!
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave." |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Big Book of War - Twilight 2000 Filedump Site Guns don't kill people,apes with guns do. ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
On the other hand, I find wiser to consider that they were obeing orders. The allies assumed a similar position as it is proven by the Nuremberg Trial. Nazi leaders were prosecuted, convicted (death or imprisonment sentences) or relaeased (Hjalmar Schacht). Admiral Raeder (commanding the surface fleet) was among them and sentenced to life imprisonment. Admiral Donitz (commanding the submarines) was condemned to only ten years but submarines warfare remain legal. For info Schacht was a banker who finally opposed hitler and had spent at least a year in concentration camps (Ravensbruck and Dachau). Nothings perfect. Targan, I understand your position but that would imply to execute every soldier involved in illegal action (that will be a lot if not all). We do (martial courts) but when we know the true responsible people, it's always better to spare lives. Moreover, martial courts often sentence to death soldiers who are not guilty of much. The French strike leaders of 1916 (I believe) were executed and obviously they were right. However, the high ranking officers (Marshall Foch, Petain...) were praised as heroes and still are. I consider them to be war criminals as I can't find any justification in killing your own soldiers needlessly by sending them over and over on pointless assaults. I'm not the one saying that as trench warfare as it was conducted in WWI is widely regarded today as pure insanity. Hopefully, for that matter, time as changed and I even have American friends dreaming of getting after Bush for war crimes (not for invading Irak but for being responsible for 35000 U.S. casualties, plus tortures, Guantanamo..., and why not financing terrorism). Last edited by Mohoender; 10-08-2008 at 01:03 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah but the generals were following protocol! Tradition my freind. We must preserve order for the sake of order. Right or Wrong be damned!
It is the institution that is at stake after all, and that must not be challenged. Then again, maybe I have read "Billy Budd" or watched "Paths to Glory" one to many times. Ah, I know, it was my watching "Breaker Morant" last weekend! Thats it. Quote:
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave." |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() In France everyone knows about "Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité" (Freedom, Equality and Franternity) but fewer people know about what should govern our government actions : In the name of the people, for the people and by the people. Politicians worldwide are getting on my nerves but, as a result, I read our constitution (thanks them). However, my position is valid only for France but when I have American friends telling me that they are affraid of their government, I don't like it. (Oops, I'm getting too much in politics again I do a post about that). |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And as you well know, "I was just following orders" is not an acceptable defence in a war crimes trial. Is not and should not be. Even in basic training I had sufficient explanations given to me to know an illegal order when I hear it.
__________________
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The crews of British and American bomberplanes that openly followed the strategy of bombing enemy civillians en masse to terrorize the enemy population to give in ? Or even the use of nuclear weapons ? All easily defined as major war crimes by standards that were apllied then as today . I believe the Q-ships are a British denomination actually -they had several -albeit not as clever or succesful as the Germans.Then again there was more allied shipping to attack.. The Germans called them merchant raiders /Hilfskreuser or some such . Anyways -had I lived back then or had relatives onboard I would have probably chimed in with you targan-but as I live blessedly far removed from such things I take another -the opposite stand . (My party is condemned to death in absentia by MilGov for warcrimes etc ..they figure on MilGovs deck of villain cards as the most wanted rebel/bandit leaders in the CONUS.hehe They even compete to "improve "their ranking some times ..anyways -thats neither here nor there ) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats something to consider!
That old derelict ship you see actualy turns out to be a Russian Q ship who is sitting in port only to gather intel?
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave." |
![]() |
Tags |
watercraft |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More Ships | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 2 | 06-21-2018 08:49 PM |
Call Sign Book for Ships | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 0 | 09-10-2008 03:02 AM |