RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2009, 10:02 AM
natehale1971's Avatar
natehale1971 natehale1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monroe, NC, USA
Posts: 1,199
Send a message via AIM to natehale1971 Send a message via MSN to natehale1971 Send a message via Yahoo to natehale1971
Default Cargo Submarines...

I've been doing a little reseach on Typhoon submarines, and read where Rubin Design Bureau has been wanting to create merchant cargo submarines based upon the Typhoon hull. This has been something Sci-Fi writers have been doing alot (i can't count the number of pictures from the Cyberpunk RPG sourcebooks of various cargo subs that look like the Typhoon-class, admittedly one of the coolest looking subs i've ever seen)...

It's made me ask the question "If the Cold War had continued, how much more developed would Submarine technology have gone?"

Would we actually have cargo submarines operating in use by both the civilian and military markets?
__________________
Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2009, 11:40 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by natehale1971 View Post
Would we actually have cargo submarines operating in use by both the civilian and military markets?
Civilian-operated cargo subs do exist but are not utilised in exactly the manner I think you are suggesting... as in, there have been several cases I have seen news reports about which involved the detection and seizure of submersibles and semi-submersibles being used to smuggle drugs (cocaine into the US IIRC).
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2009, 12:25 PM
natehale1971's Avatar
natehale1971 natehale1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monroe, NC, USA
Posts: 1,199
Send a message via AIM to natehale1971 Send a message via MSN to natehale1971 Send a message via Yahoo to natehale1971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Targan View Post
Civilian-operated cargo subs do exist but are not utilised in exactly the manner I think you are suggesting... as in, there have been several cases I have seen news reports about which involved the detection and seizure of submersibles and semi-submersibles being used to smuggle drugs (cocaine into the US IIRC).
I've known of subs being used by smugglers, and their being intercepted by the Coast Guard over the past ten (almost twenty) years... Even read a report about a group of industrious cartel smugglers who actually had a type of submarine built just for smugglilng their product.

I was thinking more of a legal merchant fleet of submersibles. especially with the growth of pirates in modern times off the horn of africa... submersibles would be just one kind of answer against such low-tech criminals. while also creating a new headache for coast guard formation trying to deal with smuggling.

but the possibility of drilling for artic oil and getting it out would be enough to start deveopment... but also with the continuation of the Cold War it could become an answer to problems for some counties as well.
__________________
Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2009, 02:23 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,347
Default

You can strip out a military sub to be a cargo vessel. The Germans and Japanese did that in World War II to send items, expert personnel, and intelligence back and forth when they wanted to be sure (as possible) that they would not be intercepted.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2009, 02:55 PM
Mohoender's Avatar
Mohoender Mohoender is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Near Cannes, South of France
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
You can strip out a military sub to be a cargo vessel. The Germans and Japanese did that in World War II to send items, expert personnel, and intelligence back and forth when they wanted to be sure (as possible) that they would not be intercepted.
Perfectly true for the Japanese and the German sub you are talking about were converted Type IXD1. In addition the Germans designed such cargo subs during both world wars.

In WW1 they had designed the U-151 but only 2 out of 7 were completed as cargo: Deutschland and Bremen. They had a cargo capacity of 700 tons and would have been used between USA and Germany.

In WW2 they designed the type XIV (10 units) that had a cargo capacity of 430 tons+torpedo supply. All were lost to air attacks.

For my part I had the barrikada converted to a cargo sub (my players failed that one). This Typhoon was brought back to Russia, it was stripped of the three remaining missiles (placed on trains) and converted to a cargo/special mission sub.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2009, 03:24 PM
natehale1971's Avatar
natehale1971 natehale1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monroe, NC, USA
Posts: 1,199
Send a message via AIM to natehale1971 Send a message via MSN to natehale1971 Send a message via Yahoo to natehale1971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohoender View Post
Perfectly true for the Japanese and the German sub you are talking about were converted Type IXD1. In addition the Germans designed such cargo subs during both world wars.

In WW1 they had designed the U-151 but only 2 out of 7 were completed as cargo: Deutschland and Bremen. They had a cargo capacity of 700 tons and would have been used between USA and Germany.

In WW2 they designed the type XIV (10 units) that had a cargo capacity of 430 tons+torpedo supply. All were lost to air attacks.

For my part I had the barrikada converted to a cargo sub (my players failed that one). This Typhoon was brought back to Russia, it was stripped of the three remaining missiles (placed on trains) and converted to a cargo/special mission sub.
If i remember right, the cargo subs during WW2 where called 'milkcows' by the Germans
__________________
Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-27-2009, 03:24 PM
Abbott Shaull Abbott Shaull is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Eastern U.P. on the edge of Civilization.
Posts: 1,086
Default

The Japanese were working one that could be used with limit Aircraft carrier capabilities. I forget the exact details, but I seen on the history channel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_aircraft_carrier

Last edited by Abbott Shaull; 12-27-2009 at 03:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.