|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Soviet high-speed pontoons for tanks
An interesting article showing some images of a device designed in the 1950s for the high speed delivery of tanks over water.
It's claimed that the tank could even fire its main gun in sea states of 1.5 or less. http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2...borne-vehicle/ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Actually that kind of devices are/were in use by the French, German, US and UK armies.
This is the Gillois now replaced by the Engin de Franchissement de l'Avant (EFA) which can be used as bridge or tank carrying craft The engineer regiment that was located at Epernay had plenty of these and they were impressive. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The Soviet hydrofoil tank pontoons (for want of a better name) have no analogue that I can find in Western armies. They weren't simply for crossing from riverbank to riverbank, they were also for transporting individual tanks from coast to coast. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with you. What I said came from a confusion on my part. However, the PTS has nothing in common with the vehicle i depict here.
PTS are purely amphibious vehicles that cannot transform into a bridge. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
The Japanese had a tank in WWII (Ha-Go, IIRC) that could do that. Not as fast, mind, but it definitely had pontoons it could drop once it reached land.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
OK, that's just weird.
And that picture of the strongest woman in Sweden on the same page? GROSS!!
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I like it! The Soviets always were very interested in crossing water obstacles, developing many different strategies like snorkels on tanks, amphibious vehicles, and the awesome ekranoplan. I guess they gave up on the pontoons when they developed the wide variety of hovercraft later on. Tony |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|