RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2013, 09:16 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,347
Default Female infantry

Story: http://www.examiner.com/article/wome...-grueling-test

I think it's partially bull -- if these women are qualified to be infantry, that's what they should be allowed to do. I knew a lot of male infantry that didn't belong in that MOS -- personnel with ability are always appreciated; in my mind, male or female makes no difference.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2013, 08:36 AM
Realpity Realpity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Great White North of Canada
Posts: 6
Default

Agreed. They qualify & they want to serve, let them. Fortunately it looks like more and more countries seem to be`thinking this way.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2013, 11:31 AM
rcaf_777's Avatar
rcaf_777 rcaf_777 is offline
Staff Headquarter Weinie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Petawawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,104
Default

The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) as been CO-ED since 1989, but I must say have served in Combat Units I have not seen a lot women as Infantry, Armour, Artillery or Combat Engineer. The ones I have know are are reservist and few stay as combat MOS. Most I found have remuster in my trade (Clerk) or Medic.

One of the Combat MOS that I have seen a lot of women in are Military Police

But dose that count a a Combat MOS?
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2013, 11:41 PM
stormlion1's Avatar
stormlion1 stormlion1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 581
Default

Military Police really doesn't count as a Combat MOS (And I say this as a former USAF Security Policeman) but there typically used that way even though there training only just touch's on the subject. At the most there supposed to do patrols near bases, defend perimeters, and take care of Prisoners of War but as events move on a commander on the ground see's the MP's as Infantry and uses them as such. But the bulk of the training they receive is Law Enforcement, asset protection, riot control, and sundry other minor league work. I believe that the use of MP's for traditionally Infantry related jobs is pretty widespread though in the modern world so a lot of them are learning by doing. So putting women in a MP unit breaks the spirit of the regs if not the letter of them. I can think of one girl I knew who was a dog handler that was deployed to Iraq with a explosive sniffing dog and did plenty of IED detection missions ahead of convoys.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2013, 02:45 AM
Rockwolf66's Avatar
Rockwolf66 Rockwolf66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 288
Default

Well an Author that I know and former Lieutenant Coronel Tom Kratman has the following to say about Women in the Military.

http://www.baen.com/amazonsrightbreast.asp

Now as someone who has worked physical labor I will readily admit that there are jobs where a woman has to be extraordinary in order to keep up with the guys. There have also been times when I really wish my co-workers didn't think with their dicks.

What I am getting at is that if a woman is good enough to do the job and do it right then let her.

The big issue I see is that too many people let their political ideology color their views on the subject.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2013, 02:51 PM
mikeo80 mikeo80 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 962
Default

In My Humble Opinion, in the middle of the chaos that is T2K, a commander will use any body that is available. Just because one soldier has different plumbing than another does not detract from the ability of both soldiers to use a gun, spot shell fall, or other wise commit mayhem upon the enemy.

My $0.02

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2013, 09:28 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcaf_777 View Post
One of the Combat MOS that I have seen a lot of women in are Military Police
It's not considered a combat MOS in the US Army, but there is a reason why they have the nickname in the Army as "Rear Area Infantrymen."
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2013, 06:59 AM
.45cultist .45cultist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
It's not considered a combat MOS in the US Army, but there is a reason why they have the nickname in the Army as "Rear Area Infantrymen."
The MP units in Saigon during Tet were awarded Combat Infantry Badge. I think that would occur again in the Twilight War world.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2013, 04:51 PM
Tegyrius's Avatar
Tegyrius Tegyrius is offline
This Sourcebook Kills Fascists
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 909
Default

Yep, and I think this thread is trying to go in two different directions. The U.S. military (and stateside political environment) of today is not the same as the U.S. military of Twilight: 2000 circa 1998. We need to be clear which one we're discussing here.

- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996

Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog.

It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
- Josh Olson
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.