|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Morrow Aviation Assets
So far outlined in the 3rd edition and modules the Project has available.
Any of these can be armed and perform a ground attack role. The Project doesn't appear to offer anything fixed wing with an air superiority role. That is why I recommend the "light" and properly described defensive fighter for this role, the F-5 Freedom Fighter. The role of protecting Morrow assets from Soviet air assets, and rogue units of the U.S., Canadian, and Mexican air forces. At the same time without appearing to challenge the legitimate air force of the U.S. government. Last edited by ArmySGT.; 04-02-2014 at 05:18 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
The next asset I would propose........ Aerostats. These are lighter than air lift vehicles without a crew that remain tethered to a location. Uses include
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I see the Morrow Project having Cargo Planes and other aircraft like that, but I don't see them having any fighter aircraft. Too noticeable to go missing and the Project could depend on USAF or National Guard Aircraft to do any defending as there expected to wake up five years after a Nuclear Strike. There job is to help rebuild, not fight a war. So Cargo Planes and Helicopters. Lots of Helicopters, probably old Huey's as there were plenty made and were pretty rugged. They could serve as a gunship in a pinch but better for moving assets around to aid in the rebuilding project. Plus they don't need a runway like cargo planes.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe Spain's supplemental order of eight AV-8S Matadors in the 1980's were re-routed to the MP. This provide a flight of four at PB and the backup base.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This precipitated the events that takes out the base staff and sets up for the faulty random numbers generator to wake Teams. So I think, given that, The Project facilities are meant to be hidden until needed. Then at D+ 5 years the Project begins and a huge glowing "open for business" sign goes up over Prime, Regional Bases, and Depots. That means the defensive nature of the Projects weapon systems (Anti tank but, no Tanks) means local defense of assets and refugees. This then means the need is to be active out to a minimum range, or plan on no assistance from a .mil asset actively engaged in the Soviet attack and invasion. F-5s are short ranged and rely on a ground station to vector them to a target. Their armament is light and fuel capacity isn't great. The U.S. is fully aware of the capabilities (unless this is a fusion powered F-5!) and the radar profile is stored in the DoD computers for comparison. Thus, a short ranged F-5 that launches only on command of a ground station and orbits an area no greater than 100 mile radius in a desolate area is going to make the DoD scratch their heads. The .gov remaining certainly would like to take control of or at minimum integrate those F-5s into an overall air defense plan if the project had happened at D + 5 years. There isn't a .gov or .mil asset until one of the "New Presidencies" can be determined to be legitimate, if that ever happens. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|
|