RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-16-2014, 02:00 PM
kalos72's Avatar
kalos72 kalos72 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 921
Default Some of my Texas Data

So, its been awhile since I have posted, thought i would see what you guys think.

My campaign is an ultra realistic attempt to flesh out something very similar to the DC Groups "US Recovery Plan" threads where an expanded 1st Cavalry comes back to texas.

Then combine the massive undertaking that was put together to detail out the states populations and then new estimated populations after the war.

Add some oil production estimations and such...

Attached is my first attempts at something similar to meet the Texas coastal campaign I am managing...
Attached Files
File Type: xlsx TXCountyNumbers.xlsx (29.9 KB, 86 views)
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!"
TheDarkProphet
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2014, 07:00 AM
kalos72's Avatar
kalos72 kalos72 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 921
Default

Ok so does this stuff not make any sense to people or is it way off? Looking for some feedback actually...

The idea is I took normal 1990's oil production, population and land area numbers to determine roughly what those numbers might be in a T2K world.

I used a 10% of land area, assuming that as an average that was the very least I should be able to use for food production.

I used 0.1% of oil production numbers, thinking that even after the Mexicans running through, I dedicated and organized force within a secure areas could get at least that going with some effort. That was one major problem I had with the "Red Star" module..no one pumped any oil apparently.

Thoughts?
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!"
TheDarkProphet
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2014, 07:37 AM
kato13's Avatar
kato13 kato13 is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il USA
Posts: 3,720
Send a message via ICQ to kato13
Default

I have looked at your numbers but have not digested them yet.

I agree with you that given there were IIRC 57,000 plus productive wells in Texas in 1997, Texas should have some oil. Scorched Earth policies will significantly curtail production, but all would not be lost.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2014, 09:29 PM
kalos72's Avatar
kalos72 kalos72 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 921
Default

If you disagree or dont understand what I was going for here, please ask. I'd like to see if my thought process was logical or if I missed the boat here...
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!"
TheDarkProphet
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.