![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I think of dusting off T2013, I had a question. Does the T2013 gang "bounce" between versions with conversions of their characters? I'm looking at pushing the timeline back to the election of '16. This would allow Russia the opportunity to up arm and the West to scramble to rearm.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There's nothing in the rules set to prevent this. With the exception of gear, all the rules were designed to permit play in any era between the late 1980s and the next decade. I know some groups have done classic 1.0/2.0/2.2 timeline conversions.
- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996 Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog. It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't. - Josh Olson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another thread on T2013 vehicles gave me the bug and I think Russia might need a few years to be a larger threat. Also gives Europe more time to simmer.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like the Rebuilding, Coolness, and Initiative rules from Twilight 2013. I mix all of the editions together.
I was thinking about this as a proposed timeline. In 2025, the US is struggling through a "Major Depression." We are on the verge of "bankruptcy" due to a number of factors. Rising fuel costs, several Very costly (up to a trillion dollars) cyber attacks on our markets and retail sectors. Several Severe Weather incidents (tornadoes and hurricanes) and a deadly Influenza outbreak in the US and Europe. The Chinese are also suffering and have put "designs" on certain resources in the Pacific Rim. The "buildup" of the war in the Pacific Rim would start with a conflict in the Korean theater along with a clash between China and Japan over resources in the currently claimed "Chinese Exclusion Zone" (the island chains that China is already in dispute with Japan and the Philippines over). China manages to subvert Malaysia (which has a significant percentage of its population of Chinese decent) and they join (clandestinely at first) the fray for a share of the resources. The newly launched Chinese Carriers are used to good effect. This forces the US to intervene. This "Intervention" causes China to launch an "Economic" offensive against the US. The US finds itself fighting a "two front brush war" in the Pacific Rim with a "failing" dollar. It has a technological advantage, but is logistically "stretched to the breaking point." trying to keep these conflicts supplied with a reduced fleet strength. Russia has stepped up "support" for rebels in the Ukraine and is now threatening Georgia and Estonia again. It has renewed its mutual defense pacts with Iran and China (the one they are working on right now). Western Europe's very troubling "let's not intervene in the Ukraine" attitude (as demonstrated by the recent EU vote taken on the Ukraine) along with the EU's weak "Depression Era" economy encourages Russian aggression (its own economy strengthened by skyrocketing fuel prices). The Russians use the "excuse" of protecting Russian lives to enter the Ukraine. Poland moves to secure its Eastern border and support the Ukraine. Full scale hostilities ensue. The EU gets "drawn into" the conflict when the Russians pull a foolish move. They attempt to "cut off" the Ukraine by launching an offensive through Belorussia along the Polish border and come into conflict with the Poles (on Polish soil). NATO is now involved in a conflict in Europe. Iran (probably at Russian and Chinese prompting) stirs up unrest in the Middle East just as the EU and Pacific Rim begin to escalate. The US is forced to support its allies in the gulf against actions in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq. Once again, the US is technologically more than a match, but are out manned by so many commitments at once. Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are surrounded by hostile forces and begin to press for full US intervention in the region. When you step back and look at all of these "Regional Conflicts" (some of a limited scope), You realize that the WORLD is at war. We started World War 3 and didn't even know it.... Last edited by swaghauler; 02-13-2015 at 02:52 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't forget what happened in Paris... instead of launching a nuke at Belorussia what if France launched one at ISIS in the Middle East... image the repercussions.
__________________
************************************* Each day I encounter stupid people I keep wondering... is today when I get my first assault charge?? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also still have the zombie stats.....
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would be ugly. The other reality wouldn't be much better. ISIS is a Sunni based extremist group created in a backlash against Shiite oppression. What if we bombed ISIS out of existence, and the Shiite extremists (backed by a possibly nuclear Iran) took over in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Lebanon. The pressure on Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and The Emirates would be extreme. Israel would be virtually under siege. I believe that even Egypt would be in potential jeopardy during a Shiite "Arab Spring" where (western aligned?) moderate Muslims were being persecuted.
|
![]() |
Tags |
t2013 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|