|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Airlords alternate blimp
I saw this article and thought about the blimp. This thing can stay aloft for days and can be configured to carry 10 tons of cargo or 48 passengers. It also says it can go 92 MPH. Looks like it has 'Modules' for different applications.
Airlander 10 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/airlande...t-test-flight/ It could carry multiple ultralights quite easily. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting, if a little late for the T2k timeline.
Hope it's a commercial success even though the USAF passed on it.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I figured it was too late for the timeline, but more feasible than an atomic airship. I would trade this out for the blimp in the module and give the Airlords a bunch of ultralights along with a few crop dusters and a helicopter of some type. Easy enough to say the blimp is an early prototype with SoTA solar panels integrated into the skin and high-efficiency motors.
I would limit the top speed to about 30 mph fully loaded, but it would be capable of launching a large number of ultralights very quickly. It could also carry many bombs; even improvised explosives could be devastating in enough numbers. Stockpiles of helium and the early confiscation several rural airfields to secure avgas would grant the Airlords a massive, if short lived advantage in taking over targeted communities. The cropdusters and helicopter would only be used for special operations, or as a way of escape for the leadership. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes, there is the issue of carrying water for the turbine, but condensation/reclamation systems should help there, and topping up the tank every few days shouldn't be much of a problem either. So why aren't there already nuclear powered aircraft? Fear mostly, and the weight of the shielding. In an airship weight shouldn't be too much of a factor, and the fear issue was covered in the module. Edit: found reactor research from 1965 which did away with water and just used air to run the turbine. They'd gotten the weight down to 250 tonnes at that point. Another 30+ years of development and I'd expect they'd just about halve that weight using new materials and technologies.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem Last edited by Legbreaker; 03-10-2016 at 05:52 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nothing stops one from using a later timeline. That's good for an update!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Zeppelin in Timeline
Here's one more suited to the timeline:
The Zeppelin NT ("Neue Technologie", German for new technology) is a class of helium-filled airships being manufactured since the 1990s by the German company Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik GmbH (ZLT) in Friedrichshafen.[1] The initial model is the NT07. The company considers itself the successor of the companies founded by Ferdinand von Zeppelin which constructed and operated the very successful Zeppelin airships in the first third of the 20th century. There are, however, a number of notable differences between the Zeppelin NT and the airships of those days, as well as between the Zeppelin NT and usual non-rigid airships known as blimps. The Zeppelin NT is classified as a semi-rigid airship.Full wikipedia entry I remember this at the time, as I am a bit of a dirigible enthusiast. It's range is some 900 km, and its load is just shy of 2 tons, but I just got an idea...
And then you would have an actual airship to sell to the Airlords of the Ozarks and continue your adventures in the US... Uncle Ted |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|