|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Military Bases in SOCAL
I was wondering about the likely fate of military bases in southern California that are more in the desert. Specifically I'm thinking of Twenty-Nine Palms and Fort Irwin. What is the likelihood that they would be maintained in 2000? Each has acted as vitally important training and support facilities for the USMC and the Army. I realize in Twilight canon most Marines are overseas in the Gulf or Korea and one division in Germany, but nevertheless there are a lot of USMC personnel who are not assigned to combat divisions, and the same goes for the Army.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If you look at where 29 Palms is in relation to Mexico, you will see that it is not even 100 miles north of the Mexican border by the Sonoran Desert. Any invasion of California MUST secure 29 Palms and even China Lake in order to prevent the US from taking the advancing Mexican Army in the flank. There are few roads out there and securing that area would block reinforcements from New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas. In summation, 29 Palms is either "disputed" or in Mexican hands based on whether you follow Cannon or not.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
To name a few, I'm sure someone can post about their fate
Fort MacArthur Naval Air Station Point Mugu Naval Construction Battalion Center Port Hueneme Marine Corps Air Station El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Tustin Los Angeles Air Force Base Norton Air Force Base (In use till 1995) United States Air Force Plant 42 Morris Reservoir Naval Weapons Test Site (in use till 1995) Coast Guard Air Station Los Angeles West Los Angeles VA Medical Center Ground Equipment Facility J-31(FAA Radar Site)
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The only real canon disposition for the Mexican Army in California would be from City of Angels and the Mojave CA force you are talking about is Force Green that is Mojave CA and patrols from Mojave to Barstow to stop any advance into CA from NV
City of Angels is seen by many as apocrypha - however I have talked to Marc Miller about a rewrite and he said that he is not interested in rewriting it - i..e it would stand as canon Challenge 27 gives the forces in CA as the following - and it was written by Frank Chadwick so I would give it pretty much the canon stamp Ejercito de California (Southern California and Baja Califonia) la Brigada: 1,100 men, 6 AFVs 2o Regimento Caballeria: 500 men, 2 AFV Brigada La Paz: 600 men, 3 AFVs Brigada Nogales: 600 men, 1 AFV Brigada Hermosillo: 700 men, 4 AFVs Regimento lnfanteria Activo Tijuana: 200 men Marauders Southern California Brigada Tepic: 1000 men, 1 AFV (now broken up into numerous small banderas) Brigada Ensenada: 800 men (now broken up into numerous small banderas) I have looked at the forces in City of Angels and Challenge 27 and I would think that what City of Angels was trying to describe was the 1a Brigada spread out in CA north of LA but giving them Soviet instead of Mexican equipment - Thus if the 1a Brigada is spread out from Ventura to Barstow I would think the most likely unit that would be at 29 Palms to be the 2o Regimento Caballeria: 500 men, 2 AFV as it would have been the unit supporting the initial invasion and probably was detailed along with other units to make sure that whatever Marines were still deployed there were engaged They most likely were initially supported by the Mexicali Brigada and eventually Colima as well - but since those two units ended up in Arizona on the opposite side of the Mexican civil war there is every chance that they were driven into AZ by the 2nd Regiment after they had taken 29 Palms |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
By hey play what you like. http://www.nucleardarkness.org/nucle...sionsimulator/
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|