|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Soviet Light Division c. 1987
I'd never heard of this experiment before. Video bro does a good job of breaking its TOE, task, and purpose down, but doesn't cite his sources.
https://www.battleorder.org/post/ussr-light I did a bit of poking around on the interwebs and have been unable to find corroborating sources, so far. Nevertheless, it's an interesting concept. From a T2k POV, I wonder if the Soviets, as the Twilight War grinded on, might have adopted a similar divisional TOE, at least in part, to account for a growing deficit of AFVs. As always, I'm interested as to your thoughts on this topic. -
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The video on YouTube lists a Russian-language source. I tried running it through Google Translate, but it didn't come out very legible.
Looking through my copy of Weapons and Tactics of the Soviet Army for comparisons, it almost felt like a heavy airborne formation. Take an airborne unit, add about 33% more artillery and air defense and more trucks to replace the BMDs, and you've pretty much got the equivalent light motor rifle unit. I can't help but feel that they'd sorely miss the organic fire support from having IFVs replaced by unarmed trucks. The added artillery might offset that somewhat, especially with Russia's love of using artillery against any target they can, but this is going to be a force whose mobility drops way off once it's in contact with an enemy, because soft trucks can't be used the same way as even lightly armored IFVs. Overall, I agree with the conclusion that there's not much point to this unit in a European war, at least not the one the Soviet Union expected to fight. As a defensive unit in mountains or urban environments it could serve about as well as a standard rifle division. On the offensive or defending flanks during a thrust towards Western Europe, I'm more skeptical of its utility.
__________________
The poster formerly known as The Dark The Vespers War - Ninety years before the Twilight War, there was the Vespers War. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The desantura article is pretty long and seems to meander a bit, though in full it's a pretty good overview of a lot of gritty details of Soviet air-landing operations.
Quote:
For my own project, I took the line "The possibility of using light divisions was not excluded in theatres with mountainous terrain" to heart and wrote up an army list for the Northern Norway/North Cape Strategic Area, where the second-line formations are already down to a battalion of T-55s, three companies of PT-76s, and GT-S and GT-T all-terrain tractors in place of armoured personnel carriers. Replace the battalion of T-55s with a battalion of BMD-1s and it's already 90% of the way to a Light Motor-Rifle Division. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Another use for Soviet-style light divisions would be performing occupation duty in territory that isn't being actively disputed by peer-level OPFOR- for example, in parts of Romania (1e). -
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|