RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2010, 05:41 AM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default How long until the electricity fails?

So okay, this article was written in response to a "What if the zombies attack?" question but the basic info is valid. Plus the writer has let their sense of humour out for a little bit of a play and that saves it from being a dry technical talk.
I thought this might prove interesting in light of past discussions about the general level of destruction from a world war let alone due to EMP problems.
Straight Dope article
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2010, 05:49 AM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

very intresting and useful material!!
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2010, 06:25 AM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,347
Default

That article touches on something: it's not how long fuel will last, it's how long until a valid operator response and how long the load in the lines is being used before plants begin self-shutdown to protect themselves. That's not long.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-13-2010, 09:35 AM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Like the questioner in that article, I live in Vancouver and one day I found myself sitting beside a BC Hydro (the local electrical company) employee. His response was essentially the same, that hydroelectric would be the last to go, that there would probably be deliberate "islanding" of hydro dams by the authorities and the power company, and critical installations would be protected as long as possible.

There is even a scenario along these lines in the ATZ ("All Things Zombie" miniatures game) scenario book "Haven". I ran the "Protection" scenario at my local miniatures game club, and the objective was for a section of militia (squad of reservists) to guard a BC Hydro crew as they attempt to replace a downed electrical power line. This being early in the outbreak the militia were mostly harassed by civilians and not too many zombies. When they were attacked by zombies, the player always opted to hold his fire and engage with rifle butts and bayonets (presumably to the skull) because zombies are attracted to gunfire. He managed to successfully complete the scenario with no casualties except for one minor wound caused by a drive-by shooting.

But I digress!

Tony

Last edited by helbent4; 12-13-2010 at 09:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2010, 04:31 PM
mikeo80 mikeo80 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 962
Default coal

I would think that yes hydro would be the easiestnto maintain. Here in North Carolina, the options are relativly few. We have a couple of nuclear power plants and many more coal fired plants.

I would think that the nuclear plants would go off line very quickly. Just the trained man power to keep the PLANT running would be difficult a BEST.

THe coal plant might last a little longer. At least until any stockpile of coal was exhausted.

THis could set up an interesting scenario. IN NC, there are still some coal mines, some coal fired locomotives and coal fired electric plants. I could see this combination of resources being at the center of a power play between any existing civilian govt, military backed pockets of organization (Fort Bragg, Pope Air Force Base, Camp lejuene Marine base, and others) and a civilian "militia" type.

Mike strikes with his two cents....Again!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-14-2010, 05:57 PM
Panther Al's Avatar
Panther Al Panther Al is offline
Sabre Ready!
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DC Area
Posts: 849
Send a message via AIM to Panther Al
Default

I would think the other way around to be honest regarding Coal vs. Nuke. Assuming that until the TDM things more or less worked as they should manpower and supply wise. I can see the nuke plants staying online into the april-may timeframe with ease: no concerns about fuel supply but parts a manpower will become a issue fast, even if the military steps in to help the plants out. Coal on the other hand tends to have a 45 to 60 day on hand supply, let's assume the trains don't run on time and its 45. With the loss of so much use they can probably keep burning for 90 days- provided nothing major breaks (or the bulldozers run out of gas and they can't get more to reload the actual feed bunkers) they will drop dead before the end of February, at best.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.