#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I was at Yokota from '95 until '97.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
93-95 for me. I picked up T2K2 in Okinawa and fiddled with it, but I lost my notes. The thought of being half way around the world and trying to get home inspired quite a bit of material. Still wish I had them. BTW, anyone know if PRIMEBEEF or REDHORSE had combat manuals like the SEABEES?
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
[QUOTE=Olefin;70998][url]http://www.usafpolice.org/units.html[url][QUOTE]
This website also has links to SP/LE equipment and weapons and training According to the above there were also FIM-92 Stinger Teams up till the mid 90’s in Korea also
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier. Last edited by rcaf_777; 05-31-2016 at 09:56 AM. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
By the time the game starts in summer 2000, there has not been enough aircraft flying to be called an air force for a while. So they don't bother discussing it. Don't mistake that for "the air force has left everything in place." Quote:
Aircraft mechanics without aircraft are pointless - but men under military discipline with basic weapons training are called green infantrymen. This is probably one of the sources of the reinforcements or 'rebuilding the division' that are mentioned in cannon. Do recall that in V2, army troops that have no other qualification have the career "Support," but that does not stop them from being PC carrying a rifle in the game. Uncle Ted |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
but even a small force of planes is still an air force - the US had only about a half dozen planes in Bataan during the whole siege but they were still able to effectively run missions, recon, etc. - but you are right there really isn't anything left that would qualify as a pre-war Air Force outside of France and Iran (and even in Iran those numbers are puny compared to what were originally there on all sides) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
I still have trouble with the idea of "abandoned bases" in Twilight2000. They are all equipment "store houses" for "Continuity of Government" operations (these would NEVER be used in the war without DIRECT PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE) and would be the place to go in Twilight's "worst case scenario." Military Bases have secure, EMP resistant comunications, and a concentration of "hard to find" specialists in a disaster (mechanics, electronics repairmen, medical personnel etc...). They have secure housing, machine shops, heavy equipment, auxiliary power supplies and a fence for security. I cannot see ANY Military Base not under imminent threat of nuclear annihilation being "abandoned" under the conditions put forth in Twilight2000. On the contrary, I think they would be centers of power or conflict due to the technical capabilities they house.
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
What President? From MilGov's point of view there was no legitimate President until 2020.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
All true, but by the time Jan 1998 comes around some are running low on Food, Fuel, Medicine, etc. Some are overwhelmed by rioters or refugees (last submarine has this). Some are decimated (non Roman army definition) by disease. Some are downwind of fallout. Some commanders are killed in rebellion when the rank and file want to find their families. Some are overrun by Mexican or Soviet forces. Some are the targets of Marauders or become marauders themselves when the food deliveries stop. Some are infiltrated by New America. Some lose battles or defect to CIVGOV. For any particular base there could be 100 reasons Milgov decides to or is forced to abandon it. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Ever think these guys can help keep your Maintenance values from becoming a major hold-back in your travels? Or their services may be bartered for food, ammo, whatever the village, town, or city-state may have to offer? And you know there is some warlord military commander somewhere that has a museum piece aircraft that he wants to make into a combat machine.
__________________
"Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This also begs the question of why the rise of "CIVGOV." How would this entity (along with "MILGOV") actually grow to a national movement in the wake of even a limited nuclear war? How would it gather resources and use communications almost exclusively controlled by military assets? Why would BOTH entities EVEN TRY to send much-needed manpower and assets to Europe when there are foreign invaders on US soil (Alaska and the Southwest)? This just doesn't make sense. Why would the states even accept such a directive? My guess is that they wouldn't. I don't see a "CIVGOV" Movement as being anything more than a group of "5th Column conspirators" INSIDE MILGOV/COG established command working against what it sees as an increasingly "totalitarian" regime. I doubt it would ever reach the status of a "competitor" to MILGOV/COG. New America COULD show up, though. All that's needed is the absence of the federal government and a breakdown in local government to rear its ugly head. This threat could be comprised of the various US Militia Groups, The Sovereign Citizen Movement, and a number of "Conspiracy Theorists" who are seeing their worst nightmares come true under the harsh governance that is COG. Finally, I wonder why the Dev's never considered the largest threat to a post-nuclear US...The rise of Independent States. There would be literally NOTHING from preventing Ohio or PA from simply "withdrawing" from the Union in the face of ever increasing demands from either a "MILGOV" or a "CIVGOV" entity. Unlike "CIVGOV," the States HAVE the organization and the infrastructure to say "enough" and, in fact, succeed in a withdrawal from The US. These are just some of issues I have with the original Cannon. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
There are 1000 Mexicans with 5 AFVs coming up the road to your air force base. All aircraft in flying condition were consolidated in other bases months ago. You have 100 army soldiers, and 600 base personnel, mostly mechanics (with nothing to maintain but the base motor pool that has enough fuel to run 2 trucks and a hummer) and base ops folks, and a truckload of crates of rifles. Do you keep all 600 hundred maintaining the two trucks and hummer? Or keep a few on that detail and use the rest to fight the Mexicans? That would not be my first choice of use for them, but I suspect that in many cases, there aren't a lot of good choices, or sources for reinforcements. Uncle Ted |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe they expanded the "Robin Sage" instruction, where such personnel from Pope AFB are the guerillas the Green Beret students must teach as the part of their final exam.
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The issues between MilGov and CivGov were then further compounded when CivGov attempted to hold sittings of Congress (in Omaha maybe?, my memory is hazy) and there were incidents of shootings between purported "Congressmen" vying for their seats. At that point MilGov straight up refused to recognize that any of the CivGov elected representatives were legitimate.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Swag - I agree. Bases would be the center of rebuilding efforts. Now sure some are empty, destroyed, consolidated but there is no way 800 some bases around the world are all closed.
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!" TheDarkProphet |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Kind of on topic
California Fire Department has, currently, 15 OV-10 Broncos in service in firefighting duty. The Phillipine Air Force as of last count had 10 OV-10s out of 24 originally assigned counter-insurgency duties in the 90's. 18 auxiliary-jet engine equipped target-towing models went to Federal Republic of Germany. If you want to know what to do with those surplus technicians, have them retrofit combat gear onto Broncos or whatever training craft that fall into their talented hands.
__________________
"Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|