RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2016, 07:07 AM
Cdnwolf's Avatar
Cdnwolf Cdnwolf is offline
The end is nigh!!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,455
Default Radioactive radioactive (all sing along now)

Some nice easy to figure out ideas of what radiation does to the body and how to incorporate it into your next game.
Attached Images
  
__________________
*************************************
Each day I encounter stupid people I keep wondering... is today when I get my first assault charge??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2016, 06:14 PM
Draq Draq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: texas
Posts: 329
Default

I've been half heartedly trying to rework the v1 radiation.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2016, 07:04 AM
TitusPullo TitusPullo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 17
Default

WTH is MREM? I thought the proper term was RADS? Well off to google "MREM"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2016, 03:51 PM
Draq Draq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: texas
Posts: 329
Default

There are so many ways to measure radiation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2016, 06:17 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

I think rads was convenient for a game term as it was easy/convenient to identify as a dose of radiation. The term rad is an acronym for radiation absorbed dose and is a measure of the energy deposited onto/into living tissue.

The term mrem is an older measurement of radiation, it is one thousandth of a rem with mrem meaning milli Roentgen equivalent in man. I think mrem was mostly used within the USA.

Both are valid terms but with several different terms used to describe a does of radiation it all becomes quite unclear and seems just a little screwy.
There's a page describing all this in far better terms than my efforts on the following link: -
http://ieer.org/resource/classroom/m...n-terminology/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2016, 06:33 PM
Draq Draq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: texas
Posts: 329
Default

That cleared things up a little... Thanx
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2016, 06:38 PM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default

This reminds me of a rather horrifying bit about the Chernobyl accident: the on-site personnel thought they were "safe" since the dosimeters were only showing a certain amount which was concerning, but not worrying. As it turns out the dosimeters were designed to only show up to that amount. Anything higher was simply off the scale and it would not register on the meter.

They were receiving several thousand times the safe limit, even in the control room.
__________________
THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2016, 10:25 PM
ArmySGT.'s Avatar
ArmySGT. ArmySGT. is offline
Internet Intellectual
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,412
Default

Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.