RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2014, 02:40 AM
RN7 RN7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,284
Default OT: Japanese Combined Fleet

Has anyone noticed the recent multiplication of Japanese aircraft carriers, they now have seven carriers built or building. The 27,000 ton Izumo is termed a helicopter destroyer by the Japanese, and is about as big as a WW2 Essex Class carrier. And everyone worried about China having one carrier!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izumo-c...pter_destroyer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hy%C5%A...pter_destroyer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%8Cs...k_landing_ship
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2014, 03:46 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,756
Default

Excellent. More demand for Australia's iron ore exports. Keep building, Japan!
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2014, 09:31 AM
Schone23666's Avatar
Schone23666 Schone23666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 440
Default

As Targan noted, win-win for both the Aussies and Japanese in that case.

But seriously, this shouldn't be a surprise. Japan's been looking west at it's old rival China and noticing how much their military spending has quadrupled over the decades, and now the Chinese are making a lot of noise about the Spratly Islands and the two China Seas (South and East), among other things.
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2014, 10:25 AM
Badbru Badbru is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schone23666 View Post
But seriously, this shouldn't be a surprise. Japan's been looking west at it's old rival China and noticing how much their military spending has quadrupled over the decades, and now the Chinese are making a lot of noise about the Spratly Islands and the two China Seas (South and East), among other things.
Not to mention Abe's revisionist view of history re WW2 war crimes/attrocities, and the near removal of WW2 history from their school ciriculum from what I heard last year from a japanese backpacker/tourist.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2014, 12:27 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,316
Default

I think it's a direct response to the exponential growth and modernization of the PLN. DPRNK saber rattling also probably has a little something to do with it.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2014, 05:47 PM
stormlion1's Avatar
stormlion1 stormlion1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 581
Default

The 'Self Defense' portion of there military's name is getting lip service at this point, particularly due to the fact there not sure how much support there going to get from the US if things went south in Asia. There absolutely committed to being able to take care of affairs in there own waters. Its just gotten important recently due to the island dispute there having with China, and a long standing one with Russia over islands to Japans north. The next several years will be interesting I think when it comes to Asian Naval Development. China and Japan are both somewhat conventional, Taiwan is the ringer in the corner and North and South Korea have there own games going on that affect everyone in the region. And that's not including the fun to the south involving China, Philippines, and Vietnam.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2014, 06:59 PM
Schone23666's Avatar
Schone23666 Schone23666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stormlion1 View Post
The 'Self Defense' portion of there military's name is getting lip service at this point, particularly due to the fact there not sure how much support there going to get from the US if things went south in Asia. There absolutely committed to being able to take care of affairs in there own waters. Its just gotten important recently due to the island dispute there having with China, and a long standing one with Russia over islands to Japans north. The next several years will be interesting I think when it comes to Asian Naval Development. China and Japan are both somewhat conventional, Taiwan is the ringer in the corner and North and South Korea have there own games going on that affect everyone in the region. And that's not including the fun to the south involving China, Philippines, and Vietnam.
Basically another Balkans scenario that's brewing, only there's more water involved.

I think it's worth noting that, technically anyway, the JSDF carriers are meant to carry mainly helos, but I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have an issue carrying VTOL aircraft either. I believe there was a thread somewhere discussing how much redesign it would theoretically take to make a JSDF carrier capable of launching aircraft.
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.