#20
|
||||
|
||||
Having read through this thread, I think I have to comment on some things.
I don't know about the U.S. military, but at least here in Finland any show of political inclination by professional members of the military will land them in hot water with their CO, his CO and possibly with the whole of the military. A Finnish Army officer was actually reprimanded not only by the Army but also by the public opinion after he had stated to the conscripts he was training at the time, in his opinion 'a lesbian', referring to the female President of Finland, Tarja Halonen who used to be the chair person of an organization for sexual equality long before her presidency, had 'no right to be the Commander-in-Chief', which is the official status of the Finnish presidents during their term at the office. It is not unheard of for Finnish conscripts having been dismissed from the military service (and sent in to the civil service for the rest of their service period) for tattoes of Nazi-affiliation and the like. The similar treatment is given to those visibly tattooed with the insignias of the white-supremecists, who have become a general nuisance in Finland especially due to the refugees from Somalia and other nations, who have a different skin pigmentation compared to the majority of Finnish nationals. As said before by others in this thread, if symbols like the U.S. flag are important, you can not choose to ignore the SS-runes either. To say, the flying the SS-runes by an USMC unit isn't significant is hypocritical. But then again, choosing to ignore the warcrimes commited by the Allied troops during the WW2 would be hypocritical as well - my history teacher in high school used to say, 'history, like a sausage, has two opposite ends' and 'the history is that which the victor writes it to be as the losing side hardly ever has anything to say about how it is written'. Having no affiliation what-so-ever with the U.S. military, I am hardly knowledgeable enough of the U.S. code of military justice to say, what kind of a punishment should be given to the particular servicemen and their superiors who failed to act on something that will tarnish the public image of the force. However, anyone using his common sense (which is a diminishing resource in the society these days) will understand, not dealing with that kind of affiliation clearly and with enough transparency will reflect very poorly on the force in question. Being a badass and being stupid is quite far from each other in my book. As for the Holocaust, I've studied the matter quite a bit and it is a clear example of industrialized genocide against not only those of the Jewish faith but homosexuals, gypsies, political dissidents, mentally ill and other minorities that did not fit the then-popular Racial Science, which was quite rampant in the whole western world at the time. However, the only ones I've seen to use the Holocaust to justify their racistic actions against others is the nation of Israel. By saying this I do not condone the Holocaust at all, on the contrary, nor try to diminish the fates of those murdered by the Nazis. I'm just saying, things aren't that black or white at all times. Before I go in to the history of Finnish affiliation with the Nazi Germany during WW2, I simply quote Jorge "George" Santayana: 'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it'. For a little backround (those who don't want to know the background of my opinion can skip this part), Finland, during the WW2, was allied with the Nazi Germany for a couple of reasons:
Too bad, there's no spoiler-style option for posting this "appendix". Sorry about that. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|