|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Article on the growing divide between Military and Civilians
A surprisingly well-written article by the L.A. Times is out, titled "SPECIAL REPORT U.S. MILITARY AND CIVILIANS ARE INCREASINGLY DIVIDED", which can be read here:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...ry.html#page=1 It is an issue worth discussing, about the pros and cons of an "all-volunteer" force as opposed to a conscripted one, and how that might begin to generate a growing gap between military and civilian families. I'd like to know if other countries around the world that have gone from a conscript to volunteer military force have begun to experience any similar issues as well. And yes, again, kind of eerie how that could play out into a MilGov vs. CivGov scenario in T2K. That is in spite of a lot of conspiracy mongering on both the political Right and Left, that has yet to happen in real life (of course I certainly prefer it wouldn't.)
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear." — David Drake |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|