![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, exactly, it's based on the earlier Neostad, which was never available in the US if I'm not mistaken.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd been just about to post that it sounded like the Neostad....
While we're on the subject of Kel Tec, I recently saw an advert for the PMR 30 - looks decent bit of kit, although I think there have been all kinds of issues with shipping delays for it. From what I've read its an update of an old Grendel design. Is the .22 magnum round enough to turn it into a reasonable weapon, or is it still best suited for plinking? http://www.keltecweapons.com/our-guns/pistols/pmr-30/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CTizq4NCto They also built an SMG variant, solely to test the magazines apparently - looks like a lot of fun! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6GxF...eature=related
__________________
Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996 Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog. It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't. - Josh Olson |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have the PMR-30 on my site, but hadn't head of the machine pistol variant (I believe it would fall into the category of machine pistol). The main virtue seems to be magazine capacity, but I don't think the T2K rules adequately illustrate the damage difference between a .22 Long Rifle round, a .22 WMR round, and heavier rounds like .32 ACP, .380 ACP, and 9mm Parabellum. (Or for that matter, between .32 ACP, .380 ACP, and 9mm Parabellum themselves.)
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996 Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog. It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't. - Josh Olson |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Would the rapid follow up shot potential (and huge magazine capacity) not limit this as a problem? Surely three or four hits from a .22 magnum would still sting bit?
__________________
Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sting, yes. Take down reliably, no, not much chance of that.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|