RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2011, 12:30 PM
Twilight2000v3MM Twilight2000v3MM is offline
Elite Couch Commando
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brentwood (N. Cal), California
Posts: 119
Send a message via Yahoo to Twilight2000v3MM
Default

I couldn't agree more. Even if we change the time to "Twilight: 2020" I dont see the M-16/M-4 family being replaced. There are multiple calibers on the market (6.8, 6.5, 6mm, .30 shadow (?), ect.) that have varying degrees of potential but I dont see 5.56 getting replaced. I do not see anything significant in the future to replace the platform. The FN SCAR and the Remington/Bushmaster weapons are not that much of an evolution to warrant replacing the M-16/M-4. Even the gas inpingment system of the M-16/M-4 still works. Sure its dirty but with proper care it works fine.

Thats just my 2 cents.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tegyrius View Post
This. Much as I agree with the political reasons, it'll come down to logistics. No other rifle design would have the available tooling, blueprints/TDP, and base of recruitable/draftable civilian gunsmiths that the AR-15 platform has. Even with all available supplies being shipped to deployed troops aboard all available transport, you're still going to have significant quantities of 5.56x45mm in stockpiles that couldn't be moved for lack of fuel, personnel, or vehicles.

I also don't see a switch to a heavier or different caliber. A cartridge of 5.56x45mm simply takes a smaller physical quantity of resources to produce than a heavier round.

Now, moving past the standard service rifle, I can see a lot more variance in designated marksman and sniper weaponry. It may not entirely work from a strict prewar regulatory perspective, but I can see a general attitude (or even a change to regs) of "if you can qualify with it and keep it reliable and fed, you can use it" for troops in that role. From a gaming perspective, that opens the door for a lot of sniper or hunting rifles that aren't standard issue but players might like to use anyway.

- C.
__________________
Max M. "aka Moose"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2011, 01:33 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,350
Default

There are about a dozen companies cranking out various iterations of the AR-15 in the U.S. at the moment for the civilian market. I think that this well-established manufacturing base lends itself to continued production of the M-16 family as the standard service rifle for all U.S. gov./military forces after the TDM, and for the forseeable future.

The domestic companies that "manufacture" AKs and SKSs mostly use imported parts to basically kit build their rifles. These parts wouldn't be available in the Twilight timeline as the former PACT nations that currently sell those parts to American companies would not have done so if the Cold War had continued.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2011, 01:58 PM
Panther Al's Avatar
Panther Al Panther Al is offline
Sabre Ready!
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DC Area
Posts: 849
Send a message via AIM to Panther Al
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilight2000v3MM View Post
I couldn't agree more. Even if we change the time to "Twilight: 2020" I dont see the M-16/M-4 family being replaced. There are multiple calibers on the market (6.8, 6.5, 6mm, .30 shadow (?), ect.) that have varying degrees of potential but I dont see 5.56 getting replaced. I do not see anything significant in the future to replace the platform. The FN SCAR and the Remington/Bushmaster weapons are not that much of an evolution to warrant replacing the M-16/M-4. Even the gas inpingment system of the M-16/M-4 still works. Sure its dirty but with proper care it works fine.

Thats just my 2 cents.
Indeed, between this and the aforementioned post regarding the massive numbers of secondary suppliers of black rifles, there is little to no reason I can see that would allow MilGov to do anything else but to push the AR, to do anything else would require too much effort. I could see some of the resources diverted to make a small percentage of the AR's in 7.62, but other than that, not really seeing anything else but.

As to TW2020 - the game I have pretty much been running on a very off and on basis is based in that year. Did a very basic overview to reason out some the reasons for things, and to provide excuses for some of the choices, but not much more than that.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2011, 04:07 AM
Arrissen Arrissen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 38
Default

American-made M16/ M4 series depending on local logistical requirements etc. Civgov are a bunch of pussies though I reckon! Yeah you heard right people, I mean what self-respecting military man would want to work for them anyway? Especially post-WWIII when the nukes have rained down and martial law is in effect? Sure some fellas would be stuck wherever and caught up in unit and/ or regional politics blah blah blah. IMO, they should rebel first chance they get and tear Civgov a new one so as not to be shot for being traitors. And if they were using the same ammo as Milgov then all the better. Just sayin.

Last edited by Arrissen; 05-17-2011 at 04:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2011, 07:00 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,763
Default

Awesome rant!
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2011, 01:49 PM
HorseSoldier HorseSoldier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 846
Default

New production M16 or M4 would be problematic without a global economy. If chemical industry isn't up to matching 60s era propellant efficiency, the caliber might be a problem too.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:13 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,350
Default

What about the M16EZ of T2K infamy? Whenever one can justify the inclusion of canonical items, I consider it a win.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:34 PM
95th Rifleman 95th Rifleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Default

I don't see America getting rid of the M16 platform for a very long time. The newer weapons like the ACR/SCAR may see use in special forces units such as the Rangers, but I can't see America changing it's regular weapon unless technology changes (such as caseless ammo becoming reliable and economical).

To change over production for an army the size and scale of the US military is just too expensive. When you consider the almost modular nature of the M16 platform it seems more feasible that they would just upgrade what they have. A good example is the HK416, a modern, more reliable weapon. M4's can be converted to the HK416 by replacing the upper reciever.

I can see the US military using M16/M4 platforms for maybe another 30 or even 40 years.
__________________
Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-17-2011, 05:38 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrissen View Post
...I mean what self-respecting military man would want to work for them anyway?
I'm with you there! Sure there'd be units raised by Civgov from the available manpower, but prexisting units?

As for the M16EZ, it's possible I suppose that worn out components previously melted down would instead be reworked once the facilities for recycling the materials were toast. Prior to late 98 though I'm just not convinced it would be happening, but as time dragged on...
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-17-2011, 07:08 PM
HorseSoldier HorseSoldier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 846
Default

M16EZ is stated to be mixes of used parts and pre-war production.

The M16 requires aircraft aluminum to manufacture. You could sub wood for the plastic furniture, but I don't know about a milled hunk of steel for the receiver. Even if it works it is heavy and inefficient. Something stamped a la the AK or AR-18 would be a better long term option.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-17-2011, 11:31 PM
Arrissen Arrissen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 38
Default

Civgov/ civilian weapons? Just kidding. Well mostly, but I guess a few things to consider are that if surplus weapons such as the M14 and M1 have for the most part gone to National Guard and Militia units respectively, then there aren't that many options left. And besides going back to an old weapon system may not be sustainable over the long term anyway with regard to service life.

Can the Colt factory up 'Gun River' or whatever it's called be brought back into operation? Or some of the other gun factories along the river maybe? I can't remember what happened there.

IRL, rifles that are gas piston operated rather than direct impingment operated are on the rise in a big way, such as the HK416, FN SCAR and LWRC, with plenty of other companies doing the same. I too wonder if this would not be the way forward in the 21st Century, given time and regardless of the setbacks to the arms industry caused by the war. The logic still stands; gas piston driven rifles are alot more reliable.

I can't see American fighting men adopting an AK as their mainstay unless they absolutely had to, even though they are great weapons in many ways. As for mass-produced stamped weapons, yeah there are some good examples in history, that's true. That could be an option I suppose, but just not the best deal really is it? Kind of like being stuck with a red-headed step child.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-18-2011, 12:13 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrissen View Post
Kind of like being stuck with a red-headed step child.
Ooooo, I had one of them...
And now I don't!
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.