RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Morrow Project/ Project Phoenix Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:32 PM
Darkwing Darkwing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Saint Canard
Posts: 16
Default Yellowstone eruption

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_National_Park

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_Caldera

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supervolcano

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Valley_Caldera

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valles_Caldera

I saw this a while back on Discovery. Apparently Yellowstone is past due for a massive eruption. What effects would this have on the geography after TEOTWAWKI?
__________________
"Blessed Saint Liebowitz, keep 'em dreaming down there" Astronaut Randy Claggett, Space, James Michener
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2011, 08:37 PM
robj3 robj3 is offline
Some bloke
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
What effects would this have on the geography after TEOTWAWKI?
VEI 8+, right?

Have a look at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3024/

(from one of the links at the wiki entry for supervolcano):

Scroll down to
'PREHISTORIC CALDERA-FORMING ERUPTIONS OF YELLOWSTONE'
and look at the map.

Huckleberry Creek/Lava Ridge ash beds are VEI 8 size. They range from California to Louisiana and stretch up into Minnesota and southern Canada.

Now those ash beds are several feet (metres) deep at their *edges*.
Closer in to the volcano, the ash gets thicker, and there's more rock and molten material. Then you get to the caldera, which in Yellowstone's case is about 34 miles (55 km) by 45 miles (72 km).

How much of that will be molten rock is unclear. Certainly it's going to be difficult to get close to the caldera without special equipment (heat, toxic gases).

The rest of the continental US and much of southern Canada is going to be blanketed with ash falls, depending on prevailing winds.

The global effects are limited by the amount of stratospheric dust injection and the sulphate load (cooling aerosol)...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2011, 08:47 AM
Darkwing Darkwing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Saint Canard
Posts: 16
Default

I was thinking more along the lines of what effect it would have on the game. When it happens, you'll have a nuclear winter effect for a couple years, which means famines. When it occurs in the timeline will determine how much effect it has in game. If it occurred 140 years ago, it'll reshape some geography, but most of it's effect will be gone, except for making part of the US unrecognizable to the PCs. OTOH, if it happened 6 months before waking up, it may impede the PCs immediately and provide some natural challenges.
__________________
"Blessed Saint Liebowitz, keep 'em dreaming down there" Astronaut Randy Claggett, Space, James Michener
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2011, 11:44 PM
robj3 robj3 is offline
Some bloke
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 51
Default

Darkwing wrote:
Quote:
I was thinking more along the lines of what effect it would have on the game.
I misinterpreted this:
Quote:
What effects would this have on the geography after TEOTWAWKI?
Given the area buried in ash, a significant fraction of the Project's assets may be damaged or destroyed.

As you point out, timing is everything.
Note the relatively rapid recovery of plant life using Mount St. Helens as an example:
http://www.fs.fed.us/gpnf/mshnvm/dig...reandafter.htm

This article looks like a good overview of recovery rates:
http://faculty.washington.edu/moral/...DM_Grishin.pdf

Data from Hawaii:
http://www.nps.gov/history/history/o...5/contents.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2011, 09:17 PM
WallShadow's Avatar
WallShadow WallShadow is offline
Ephemera of the Big Ka-Boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: near TMI
Posts: 574
Default

Of course one of the woefully inaccurate Soviet warheads may have detonated in the weakest point of the caldera, and Ka-boom!
__________________
"Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2011, 08:46 PM
robj3 robj3 is offline
Some bloke
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 51
Default

WallShadow wrote:
Quote:
Of course one of the woefully inaccurate Soviet warheads may have detonated in the weakest point of the caldera, and Ka-boom!
Only in some bad Bay/Emmerich pastiche.

The magma chamber is too deep for even a 20-25Mt surface burst to do that. Its uppermost point is about 3.5 miles (~6km) beneath the surface.

Ground shock at that depth would be negligible, despite the 500m crater depth and the ~2.5km (1.5 mile) fireball radius.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...me-larger.html

Soviet missiles were pretty accurate by the 1970s.
SS-18 Mod 1 or 3 with the 20-25Mt warhead had a CEP of 1000m according to the Soviets; western estimates were 300-550m.

Have a look at the Global Security website for details.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/wo...sia/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2011, 12:35 AM
robj3 robj3 is offline
Some bloke
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newcastle NSW
Posts: 51
Default

The diameter of the fireball is 2.5km, not the radius.
My mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2014, 06:57 PM
Gelrir Gelrir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 226
Default

Our current (classic-era) campaign features a Yellowstone eruption in 2020. There are several meters of ash deposited on Wyoming, Colorado, etc. ... my referee map has notations on ash depth here and there.

Except for boltholes and facilities within ~100 km of Yellowstone, there wasn't any direct effect on Project bases. However, there might be a few meters of ash on top of your bunker!

Roads and other remains of 20th Century civilization are pretty hard to find in the ash-covered areas.

http://tywkiwdbi.blogspot.com/2009/0...fall-maps.html

A few weeks later, possibly in sympathy, we had the Long Valley Eruption.

http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/vwdoc...ng_valley.html

http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Volcanoes/...framework.html

--
Michael B.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.