RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2014, 05:39 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,343
Default

I prefer a dry moat/berm wall over fencing. A chain-link fence is not much of a barrier. It's really not much more than symbolic. A station wagon could plow right through it; it wouldn't trouble a small team with wire cutters much either. Unless it was well covered by fire, it's not going to stop any but the lazy and least determined.

In general, human-power is going to be the primary means of excavating/earth moving in a T2K environment. If it means protection from existential threats, most local citizens would be willing to contribute to some sort of defense works project. This is really the basis of the neo-feudalism that I anticipate would be prevalent in a T2K world. You wouldn't even necessarily need motorized excavating equipment- just picks and shovels- I'm sure you've seen pics of Soviet babushkas digging AT ditches on the approaches to Moscow. A motorized excavator would be a luxury that many communities would not have. Those that did, however, would be able to complete defense works projects much more quickly efficiently. Such equipment could serve as a form of currency in a T2KU and securing said excavators could make a side quest for a community-building campaign.

Another option for creating walls/barricades is derelict motor vehicles. Tow or push them into position for a simple barrier. If one had to the means to stack them, you could create a more effective obstacle.

You might want to consider a hybrid with a little of every method mentioned so far. Chain link facing the marsh, a moat/berm along the most approachable part of the perimeter, wrecked cars for half-a-mile on another side, and a couple of shipping container redoubts with guard towers at intervals all along the perimeter.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

Last edited by Raellus; 02-24-2014 at 07:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2014, 07:42 PM
WallShadow's Avatar
WallShadow WallShadow is offline
Ephemera of the Big Ka-Boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: near TMI
Posts: 574
Default

With all this discussion of chain link, what has not been mentioned is using the chain link as gabion material--forming baskets out of the fencing, lining the baskets with say, old carpet, and filling the lined baskets with rubble to form building blocks of a fortification. Use a tripod lever arm to maneuver the baskets into place and Voila! a rubble/gravel wall.
__________________
"Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2014, 10:29 AM
rcaf_777's Avatar
rcaf_777 rcaf_777 is offline
Staff Headquarter Weinie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Petawawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,104
Default

Like a poor man's Hesco bastion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesco_bastion

Could also use Gabion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabion

Or Sandbags
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2014, 11:23 AM
kalos72's Avatar
kalos72 kalos72 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 921
Default

All good information...

But would YOU put some sort of physical wall/obstacle around the entire outside of your towns if able? Thinking along the 25 miles long mark....

The 43rd MP did...
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!"
TheDarkProphet
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2014, 12:45 PM
CDAT CDAT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalos72 View Post
All good information...

But would YOU put some sort of physical wall/obstacle around the entire outside of your towns if able? Thinking along the 25 miles long mark....

The 43rd MP did...
If I had the ability, in a post disaster world? YES!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2014, 12:53 PM
kato13's Avatar
kato13 kato13 is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il USA
Posts: 3,761
Send a message via ICQ to kato13
Default

According to this

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...102/Ch6.htm#s3

a trench 40233.6 Meters (25 miles) by 1.5 meters by 3.5 meters would take 2 M9 ACE 603.504 hours to complete.

Since the formulas are for anti tank ditches I would assume that number would go higher if you are on anything other than smooth ground.

Base fuel usage for the M9 (109 per period*), two of them working for 603.5 hours would be ~32891 liters of diesel.

* Source: http://www.pmulcahy.com/tracked_engi...les/us_tev.htm

Last edited by kato13; 02-25-2014 at 12:59 PM. Reason: forgot to multiply by 2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2014, 01:11 PM
kalos72's Avatar
kalos72 kalos72 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 921
Default

Without giving up too much data...

32k diesel is roughly one days production at this point in the story line...I am ok with that.

The next questions is manpower.

What good is a fence that isnt patrolled or monitored?

Assume a guard tower every 500-1000 meters over 25 miles would be 40-80 towers. Two people per tower at all times? Thats like 100-150 people per shift...3-4-5 shifts? And that will not count active patrols within the perimeter or at guard posts/gate guards and such.

Ouch.
__________________
"Oh yes, I WOOT!"
TheDarkProphet
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2014, 07:01 PM
robert.munsey robert.munsey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 27
Default

That is if those M9 ACE hydraulic hoses would stay in operation.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by kato13 View Post
According to this

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...102/Ch6.htm#s3

a trench 40233.6 Meters (25 miles) by 1.5 meters by 3.5 meters would take 2 M9 ACE 603.504 hours to complete.

Since the formulas are for anti tank ditches I would assume that number would go higher if you are on anything other than smooth ground.

Base fuel usage for the M9 (109 per period*), two of them working for 603.5 hours would be ~32891 liters of diesel.

* Source: http://www.pmulcahy.com/tracked_engi...les/us_tev.htm
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.