![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The weapon remains the same ,but the available loads for it can vary a lot .
We used to have a lot of various ammo in our forces -black ring marked armour piercing .30-06 (7,62x63), tracers with red ring marks ,regular FMJs etc etc . Same for the .308 we used later ( 7,62x51) I guess this is also the case for other rifles and handguns out there. Has anyone come up with stats for -armour piercing rounds -hollow points -long range handloads/factory loads please chime in with stats in regards to damage,penetration,range and recoil . |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one bird. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The backblast danger area for the 84mm L14A1 SRAAW (Carl Gustav) is listed as "60 metres long x 800 mils (45 degrees) from the axis".
The M72 has a danger area of 40 metres with the same angle as the 84mm. From http://www.nvbmb.nl/downloads/b-gl-314-008pt-001.pdf Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
This is from the referees screen (or more accurately the booklet that comes with it). Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Backblast:
Tghe newer rounds with the stuff be it salt water or iron dust etc may reduce the damage for someone in the backblast, but it will still put them out of action for a few moments giving them what amounts to stun damage. As for the whole armor piercing thing: Remember, alot of the markings on special ammunition is common and standard throughout NATO. I actualy had it in my magic book of knowledge that all good NCOs carried. And it was designed not just with common lettering but also with specific colors <colours for you European peoples> so that even if you didn't understand the language you could tell what type of round it was by the colored markings. As or special ammo for small arms. I would usualy give it some kind of benefit like with incidiary it would give a chance per round to catch something combustible alight. For ammo since most modern small arms rifle ammo is steel core 5.56 had no special rounds, or all of it was however you want to say it. Hollowpoint, would have moderate penetration value but I'd toss an extra dice for wounds. As for something like 7.62 I never really included it as the round itself was pretty powerful as it was, and from personal experience I have seen 8mm and 7.62X54 go through sizeable pieces of steel and most target a belt fed 7.62 or 8mm or 30-06 round hit well for the most part the round would penetrate easily or not at all. Think about it, hitting a light vehicle it would penetrate easily, on a tank or armored vehicle however, it would have little effect.
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave." |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Big Book of War - Twilight 2000 Filedump Site Guns don't kill people,apes with guns do. ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will go with C:2 = 2 dice damage to the locations turnes towards the blast I hues for the M72 and the carl Gustaf ( wich is a nasty package imho-for those who havent got it of course)
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The GM screen rules that were posted on damage enhanced rounds seem reasonable -anyone got any RL objections or other input ?
Plus 1 dice on the damage stat and plus 2 on the pen stat making penetration of anything alot less likely . ( Our book company owner and editor William Nygaard who was shot 3 times with a .44 mag by jihadists in Oslo was saved by his corduroy jacket stunting the effect of the hollowpoint bullets - say what you will of corduroy,but it is hell on those jihadist plots to undermine our democracy!) As for ap - armour piercing - does it stand to reason that damage is lowered by on dice ,but that PEN stat is one better also AND that RANGE stat also increases by say 10 or 20% ? Are there AP rounds out there say caliber .308 that would have normally damage 4 pen 2-2-3 but AP stats will be DAM 4 PEN 1-1-2 ? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
L'Argonauta, rol en català |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The rules concerning use of sighting devices could bear a little discussion . If a character uses laser sight - a little laser emitter that "paints" a red/green dor wherever its calibrated to aim -what would be the effects on the shoorting ?The rules seem calibrated for iron sights or long range scopes ,but there are implements to make shooting quicker and more accurate today . the rules in the GAZETEER supplement say that you get 2 aimed shots instead of one in a phase where you have already aimed the previous phase . But is this accurate ? Shouldnt it rather be just a numerical bonus to the roll say +1 for aimed shots or quick shots ?Or maybe " 2 aimed shots if previous phase was used to aim and +1 to quick shots ?" any other suggestions ? What about optical devices such as Aimpoint,Eotech,Holosights,Trijicon red dot sights etc etc .What kind of bonus to the shooting do you see here ? Please give some input . Last edited by headquarters; 02-27-2009 at 02:36 AM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
C:2 means what? You stand more than about an arms length or two away and effectively all that happens is your hair is messed up? The M72 danger area is 40 metres in distance! Perhaps backblast whould be treated more like burn damage rather than concussion or fragments? Using the M72 as an example (and only a suggestion, open to adjustment), damage could be in the order of 4d6 if within five metres, 3d6 out to ten, 2d6 to 20 and 1d6 to 40 metres. Hard cover halves these ranges. If fired from an enclosed area, the firer is subject to backblast damage calculated as twice the distance to the wall/obstacle directly behind them to represent the blast bouncing back at them? The ranges and damage seem a little high in the example above, but I wouldn't want to go less than half those figures. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't mean to dis anyone but the Armbrust has absolutely no backblast - it was made deliberately to be fired indoors. Uses two captive pistons, first to launch the round, second one shoves all the plastic flakes out the back. Explosion is caught inbetween and trapped.
There's some smoke but not enough to really stand out |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
4D damage is the same as the 7,62 N round gets in game.I dont really see that thats the way either .The amount of damage in physical contact with explosion is the stated number C:2 means that it has twice the potency of a 9mm round if you are at an arms length,1D up until 8 m and half that again 8-16 meters.I think the army had a few lawsuits in mind when they set the backblast ranges-at 40 m a m72 might stun you or blow a pebble in youreye ,but it is not gonna be as dangerous as being hit by a pistol shot .
all imho Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Attachment 420 This is from the US LAW manual. http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...23-25/appa.htm Quote:
Last edited by Legbreaker; 04-29-2021 at 04:57 AM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Here's my view: In v2.2 C:2 will mean 2d6 at 10m and 1d6 at 20m, distributied among all the body parts begining from head, with the possible option (in my opinion depending of the GM interpretation of the rules) to apply 2d6 additional points to one single body part if he character is just behind the weapon. If quick quill rule is used (with the chance to double the damage to the playing character if chest or head is affected), a wide range of possibe effects is possible. I agree that perhaps burn damage must be added. And I must recognize I do not know the M72 but if the 40m of safety distance is "according to manual" in the practicing fire-line, it's possible that they have taken "the worst case" as a an added precaution.
__________________
L'Argonauta, rol en català Last edited by Marc; 02-27-2009 at 03:00 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
using an optical device -not a laser- like aimpoint etc -could it stand to reason that it gives a +1 bonus to shots over the iron sights ?
|
![]() |
Tags |
rules |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rules about tracers. | Marc | Twilight 2000 Forum | 37 | 04-01-2011 01:51 PM |
An accident, v2.2 set of rules | Marc | Twilight 2000 Forum | 10 | 06-24-2009 08:26 AM |
New Damage Rules | headquarters | HQ - General Discussion | 5 | 02-18-2009 03:16 AM |
New Damage Rules | headquarters | HQ - General Discussion | 0 | 01-03-2009 01:10 PM |
melee combat | General Pain | Twilight 2000 Forum | 1 | 11-17-2008 05:12 AM |