OPSEC (Split from Mission)

[Targan]

Oh great, this should be interesting...

[kato13]

Originally Posted by Targan

Oh great, this should be interesting...

I'm hoping since both participants seem to be cut from a similar cloth, if something happens it will be like a scuffle between brothers.

Guys keep it civil and go PM if you can't please.

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by kato13

I'm hoping since both participants seem to be cut from a similar cloth, is something happens it will be like a scuffle between brothers.

Guys keep it civil and go PM if you can't please.

No issues here. That was a professional criticism that is given to the lowest Privates in the Army when we instruct them on what they can and can't tell their loved ones about operations we're conducting or planning.

I'm trying to help him out since being in the S-3 Shop of his battalion he's obviously got a security clearance and if his S-2 Shop saw that, he could get in hot water. I've seen missions get scrubbed because Joe decided to have an "I'm going away to war" party and wife A told wife B whose husband works with so-and-so.

[Targan]

PM would be the best way to go with something like that. IMO.

[TiggerCCW UK]

Duck and cover!

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by TiggerCCW UK

Duck and cover!

Why?

[headquarters]

Originally Posted by Eddie

Why?

you mean to say that you dont pick up on the LAW vs Twilight 2013 situation at all??


?

?

Well then , lets just say that law can be pretty harsh/come across in a certain way in some of his replies -and I would say you commenting on his breach of opsec is along the same line of communicating .

I prefer friendly - or at least neutral tone in the correspondance -but hey - thats just me.

Maybe kato needs to make another seperate thread so that discussion between the two of you can be contained.

yes-I predict that there will be a word-fight .

[TiggerCCW UK]

Originally Posted by Eddie

Why?

I've been on the receiving end of a Law outburst due to a misunderstanding (not worth going over again as its water under the bridge) and its not pretty. Forthright and honest would be one way of describing him.

On a personal note this is a great forum that is mostly free of the flame wars, personal attacks and general unpleasantness that plagues a lot of similar forums due to interweb anonymity and consequence free posting. Hopefully we can keep it that way here. Kato runs a good site that fulfills a lot of my gaming needs until I win the lottery and establish the Twilight Cafe and I'd hate to see it get bogged down in the sort of arseyness that hits so many forums. Basically all I'm saying is lets keep it civil folks, please.

[kato13]

I understand completely what you were saying. I just wanted to allude to the fact that you are coming from a good place and have the appropriate knowledge.

Threads exist in a vacuum and if someone was unaware of your service history (since that is not in this thread), they might not take it the way you intended regardless of the fact that it might be good and proper advice.