![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Weird. Not sure how "designed to fail" is better than incompetent...
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Incompetent means they did a poor job. Designed to fail means someone deliberately set it up to fail even though many others did there best to make it work. It looks like Morrow (who in the 4th edition dies) had a plan for the Project that was only partly set up to rebuild a nuked United States. In earlier editions its not as clear but if no one ever noticed or I haven't learned. Mr Morrow wasn't at Prime Base when it was destroyed.
Did he know something he wasn't telling anyone? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
But regardless, he was the initiator of the Project, not the sole vision behind it. Whatever his personal intentions, there were plenty of people who should have been able to see and correct the problems that endangered their own dear lives... unless, of course, they were ALL incompetent and/or suicidal. OR just Morrow's version of the Golgafrincham's "C" Ark! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Actually I kind of figured that after plans were set in motion he would send changes along after the fact. The Council of Tomorrow might have made approvals of several things that would have worked, but Morrow after the fact modified them. As far as anyone was concerned everything is as it should have been.
The question would be why. I think that rebuilding after a nuclear war would have just recreated the old United States, an angry one. By forcing the issue and waking the teams later he had a blank check to create a new nation. The entire US is either small ministates or wilderness. A true blank slate with Morrow Teams doing the rebuilding with a large leg up in comparison to other survivors. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Regardless, this Morrowluminati idea is a quite different interpretation than anything I ever saw implied in the game. Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
3rd was about saving civilization and 4th implies strong if not outright saying the Project is there to preserve and rebuild the United States of America. So when championing one or the other it helps with everyones understanding if you let people know which edition you are concerned about. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
From a practical standpoint, rebuilding the USA as it currently exists would be a monumentally complex task. Even just a few years post-apocalypse, that type of government might be very problematic and not even desired by the population. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|