![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The winter clothing issue isn't bad, it was about the same stuff I was issued in the Canadian Army at that time, I survived plenty of time in the field with it. The group equipment needs some work, a gasoline stove with 24hrs of fuel ? You've got to be kidding ! Needs a proper winter tent with liner, a folding wood stove and a bow saw. Now you can keep the tent warm, melt snow/ ice for water, cook food and dry clothing. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Damocles is already a tough adventure, no sense adding frostbite and amputated fingers/toes to it. Really though, would you send a team into a winter environment without the proper survival kit ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Updating has always seemed like a tricky business - not only is there the risk of exposure, but you are giving teams equipment they haven't been trained to use, potentially in a crucial and time-sensitive environment.
I think the best option would be to leave teams alone, then give updated gear to newer teams in the area - they have their own caches, plus the updated gear to disseminate to other teams (with training!) as prudent. If you are going to give them updated gear blind, it needs to be gear they can use without training. No point giving someone frozen in the 70's a tablet computer without someone to train them on it, but you could definitely give them a plug-and-play backend to the autonav. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course an alternative result maybe that teams get equipment removed from caches.
The project may decide it needs to concentrate certain key systems with other teams, or replace but not update. I mean for example how many Dragon, TOW and Stingers were even made in the 1980s? So perhaps the project takes an executive decision to create a special MARS regional armoury with a dozen of each. Which come from what the teams thought would be their equipment? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will attest from personal experience..... that style of stove is just garbage. It is all riveted together and you can't get in and clean it. Ours was so fouled that it barely produced a flame even after building a tripod and hoisting the can almost 8 feet off the ground.
The round "Yukon" stoves are far, far better. Honestly, the whole drip fuel thing was a pain in the ass and I blame the regulators dribbling out diesel fuel. Stoke a Yukon with wood or coal and they will glow a nice cherry red. I would give them the round Yukon or one of these THESE three dog or four dog guide stoves with a baker and water boiler. Early teams would get the Yukon and 90's or later the civvie stove based on availability. Seriously, if you see a round Yukon for sale somewhere; snatch that baby up. The only thing the "New" stove comes with that is good... the thermo electric fan. Set that directly on the stove and it will begin circulating heat. We are talking about the Morrow Project though...... So you have a lovely fusion powersource parked outside. A high output electric heater will do just fine without diesel, kerosene, or firewood needing collected. Won't smother you with carbon monoxide while your sleeping either. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The problem with a high output electric heater is the size you might have a hard time fitting in the tents pictured above Old Tech high output electric heater: http://www.globalindustrial.com/p/hv...ctric-heater-3 Current Tech high output electric heater: http://www.worldmkting.com/heavy-dut...utility-heater The Current tech would work fine, but early time might not have them (FYI you would a platform to prevent it from sinking in the snow) and you need a few grounded extension cords/power cables to run it from the any vehicle. Quote:
For Base Camps, I image the project would have some sort of portable fusion power source for running a small camp???? I would also like to add the Volvo BM Bv 202 and Bandvagn 206 (Bv 206) would great use to any team operating in a snow environment.
__________________
I will not hide. I will not be deterred nor will I be intimidated from my performing my duty, I am a Canadian Soldier. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Remove the multi fuel unit and you had a wood or coal stove. Mix some gasoline into diesel to thin it and burn that through the multi fuel insert (ranges at the chow or warming tent). Then I got to a unit that had this "new" stove. Tiny burn chamber for wood, can't remove the fuel burner to clean it. The only way to get it to burn hotter than a candle was to dump a pint of gasoline over the fuel burner and drop in some burning paper to light that. The chamber would then get hot enough to draw and atomize fuel at what was at best the low setting. Damn frustrating when a stove won't boil water. So this was the MP unit I went to Iraq with in 2003 and we used them in Dec 03, Jan-Feb 04 as nights got to 25F and even snow twice or more. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Someone also mentioned electric heaters. I would also add a hot plate per vehicle for general use. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now we're cooking
![]() Add a Bv 206 to haul it and the team and winter sucks a lot less. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|