Design Discussion: House Rules

[unipus]

I think the standard 6-attribute system has a lot of flaws and has mostly persevered through sheer inertia.

Numerically ranking intelligence and charisma are both troublesome, in their own way. Roleplaying a character with very different aspects from the player can be interesting, but for the most part players prefer to actually come up with solutions to puzzles, traps, mysteries and plans, for instance, rather than roll dice and be handed the solution.

I come from a school -- hard-learned over time from too much time and effort spent doing the opposite -- of less is more. My own system I've been working on has only four base stats (I considered using three, as Stackmouse said) and replaces Intelligence with Insight. This is not just a renaming exercise; your character can be as smart or dumb as you want; I don't care, just roleplay it. But if you need to test for something related to your capacity to understand things specific to the game setting and themes, then Insight is where we look.

Likewise, Charisma is out. In its place is Persona, which is more of a measure of your ability to influence, motivate, and your overall force of will. How that works out isn't limited to charisma in the traditional sense and you're free to present your character however you want.

[Raellus]

Originally Posted by unipus

Numerically ranking intelligence and charisma are both troublesome, in their own way. Roleplaying a character with very different aspects from the player can be interesting, but for the most part players prefer to actually come up with solutions to puzzles, traps, mysteries and plans, for instance, rather than roll dice and be handed the solution.

I come from a school -- hard-learned over time from too much time and effort spent doing the opposite -- of less is more. My own system I've been working on has only four base stats (I considered using three, as Stackmouse said) and replaces Intelligence with Insight. This is not just a renaming exercise; your character can be as smart or dumb as you want; I don't care, just roleplay it. But if you need to test for something related to your capacity to understand things specific to the game setting and themes, then Insight is where we look.

Likewise, Charisma is out. In its place is Persona, which is more of a measure of your ability to influence, motivate, and your overall force of will. How that works out isn't limited to charisma in the traditional sense and you're free to present your character however you want.

I like both of those approaches.

What do y'all think about the Cascade Skill system in v2.2. I think I like it. It makes sense, intuitively at least.

I don't want to hijack the v4 rules thread so I'll continue the approaches to handling language skills (speaking/listening v. writing/reading) discussion here. I think cascading the the two sets of language skills is probably the way to go. Writing and speaking are different skills, but not completely different, and fluency in one is a naturally boost to developing competency in the other.

-

[swaghauler]

Originally Posted by Raellus

I like both of those approaches.

What do y'all think about the Cascade Skill system in v2.2. I think I like it. It makes sense, intuitively at least.

I don't want to hijack the v4 rules thread so I'll continue the approaches to handling language skills (speaking/listening v. writing/reading) discussion here. I think cascading the the two sets of language skills is probably the way to go. Writing and speaking are different skills, but not completely different, and fluency in one is a naturally boost to developing competency in the other.

-

I agree, the Cascade System is an elegant way to group "families" of skills. I actually have additional Cascades in my homebrew game. I also include...

Construction (cascade):
Carpentry
HVAC/Plumbing
Electrical
Welding/Ironworker (riveting and fab bolting)

My Small Arms (cascade)
Pistols
Rifles
Black Powder/Primitive Firearms
Belt-Fed Machineguns

My STEM (cascade)
Chemistry
Biology
Physics

I give every associate skill in a Cascade FAMILIARIZATION (Skill Level 0) when you take a Skill in the "Cascade family." This is because the Skill you took often has some proceedures, formulas, and steps in common with the other skills in that family. In addition, you would be "exposed" to the other skills in the "family" during the course of using the Skill you took at a higher level.

I also give "SPECIALIZATIONS" based on the RAW (1 to 10) SKILL LEVEL. Thus a person with Tracked Vehicle 4 could have 4 "SPECIALIZATIONS." These are SPECIFIC Models or Types of equipment that you have handled and KNOW how to fully operate. Thus, that Tracked Vehicle driver might have the M1, M60E3, T72, and Leopard tanks as his "Specializations." He would be able to just jump in those tanks and run them without need of a manual or instruction. I generally keep weapons Specializations to action types (AK, AR, pump action, bolt action, single action revolvers, etc...)

Finally, I use TW2K13's QUALIFICATION'S Rule. This is essentially a "Skill within a Skill." Using TW2K13's own description, "ALL Surgeons are Doctors BUT... NOT ALL Doctors are Surgeons." A Qualification is a "subskill" that you must buy separately from the parent skill but that "parent skill" acts as both a "gatekeeper" and Skill Limiter to a Qualification. You must have the Parent Skill and the Qualification can NEVER exceed the Parent Skill's level. Examples of Qualifications I use are...

- Rebreather as a Qualification of SCUBA.
- Hacking as a Qualification of Computer Ops.
- Tracking as a Qualification of Perception (my Observation).
- Leadership and Interrogation as Qualifications of Persuasion.
- Engineering as a Qualification of the parent skill (Construction, Chemical, Electrical, etc...)
- EOD as a Qualification of Demolitions.
- Heavy (more than 5 tons, complex transmissions) as a Qualification of Wheeled Vehicle Driver (5 tons or less).
- Heavy, Muli-Engine, Remote-Piloted as Qualifications for Aircraft/Piloting skills.
- Mountaineering as a Qualification of Climbing.
- Celestrial Navigation as a Qualification of Navigation.
- Intrusion as a Qualification of the basic Lock Picking skill.

This adds a depth to the Skill system that RAW 2.2 simply lacks.

MY EXPERIENCE POINT SYSTEM:

I use a system pioneered by TW2K13 but modified to suit my needs. I ADD IN TOTAL ALL of the following Attributes CHA, INT, EDU, and WILL to come up with the Character's Experience Points Per Term. A perfectly average Character will have 20 exp to spend EACH term. He may spend no more than the AVERAGE OF HIS MENTAL ATTRIBUTES (CHA,INT,EDU, & WILL) rounding up per SKILL. This is in addition to any EXPERIENCE POINTS (formerly SKILL LEVELS) awarded by a term's initial training (like the skills you get in basic). That's right! Skill LEVELS in the CARREERS become EXP Points. The cost to learn a SKILL is equal to the new Level being attained BUT, you MUST buy EVERY LOWER LEVEL to advance. For Example ...

Initial Skill = 1 Exp point... This gives you Level 0 "Familiarization." All related Skills in a Cascade are also given Familiarity.

Familiarization to Level 1 = 1 Exp point
Level 1 to Level 2 = 2 Exp points
Level 2 to Level 3 = 3 Exp points and so on.

Qualifications MUST be bought in the same way a parent skill is. SPECIALIZATIONS ARE NOT BOUGHT! They are simply selected [free] with GM approval.

Any Experience Points applied to a Skill which do NOT allow it to rise to a new Skill Level ARE RETAINED in that Skill after initial Character Creation, and can be used along with game EXP points to raise the Skill during play.

[Tegyrius]

Given their relative scarcity of use, I've tinkered with collecting Swimming, Scuba, and Small Boat under an Aquatics cascade.

- C.

[CDAT]

One other thought for languages, understanding the gist of what is being said even if not the words. On my second deployment the Air Force broke down in Germany for a week (I think 100% fluke that it happened to be when the world cup was playing and the flight crew was HUGE fans), and my unit was put up in a hotel off base. One of the unit spoke German, the rest of us did not. But we found that we could understand enough to make do for most things (if they did not speak English and most did). My unit talked about this from time to time and figure it is because English kind of/sort of came from German? But for the game you could also look at adding that as a level if it works for you group.

[swaghauler]

Originally Posted by Tegyrius

Given their relative scarcity of use, I've tinkered with collecting Swimming, Scuba, and Small Boat under an Aquatics cascade.

- C.

I cannot do that in my game because of the way I have SKILLS modified.

SCUBA is a complex skill to learn. Along with the fact that it is sort of rare because you need to pass a 40 certification course to do it.

My Small Boat Handling is a cascade skill broken into: boats under 25m in LOA, pwcs (jet skis), and kayaks/canoes.

Swimming is what I call a FUNDAMENTAL skill. Everyone gets these at Familiarization Level (0 level) at character creation. My list of FUNDAMENTAL Skills include...

- Swimming
- Climbing
- Persuasion
- Move Quietly (replaces Recon)
- Hide (replaces Recon)
- Perception (a cascade skill including visual, auditory, touch, and taste/smell)
- HTH Combat
- Melee Combat
- Throw
- Native Language (at INT or EDU, which ever is higher).
- Possibly a secondary Language (at INITIAL EDU).

These all start at 0 Level unless otherwise specified.

Unskilled characters are still subject to TW2K13's roll 2D20 and take the HIGHER number rule. This can stack with my new BANE/DISADVANTAGE rule leaving a PC to roll 3D20 and take the highest number. Not an enviable position to be in.

[CDAT]

Originally Posted by swaghauler

I cannot do that in my game because of the way I have SKILLS modified.

SCUBA is a complex skill to learn. Along with the fact that it is sort of rare because you need to pass a 40 certification course to do it.

My Small Boat Handling is a cascade skill broken into: boats under 25m in LOA, pwcs (jet skis), and kayaks/canoes.

Swimming is what I call a FUNDAMENTAL skill. Everyone gets these at Familiarization Level (0 level) at character creation. My list of FUNDAMENTAL Skills include...

- Swimming
- Climbing
- Persuasion
- Move Quietly (replaces Recon)
- Hide (replaces Recon)
- Perception (a cascade skill including visual, auditory, touch, and taste/smell)
- HTH Combat
- Melee Combat
- Throw
- Native Language (at INT or EDU, which ever is higher).
- Possibly a secondary Language (at INITIAL EDU).

These all start at 0 Level unless otherwise specified.

Unskilled characters are still subject to TW2K13's roll 2D20 and take the HIGHER number rule. This can stack with my new BANE/DISADVANTAGE rule leaving a PC to roll 3D20 and take the highest number. Not an enviable position to be in.

So a question, and thought. Question first what do you mean by "you need to pass a 40 certification course to do it"? I did need to training to get "certified" for SCUBA, but after the military some of the people I have ran into at dive civilian dive spots did not take any formal training to start diving.

Thought, again when I was in the military I was amazed how many people could not swim at all, not the skill that amazed me the most that people could not do, but close.

[swaghauler]

Originally Posted by CDAT

So a question, and thought. Question first what do you mean by "you need to pass a 40 certification course to do it"? I did need to training to get "certified" for SCUBA, but after the military some of the people I have ran into at dive civilian dive spots did not take any formal training to start diving.

Thought, again when I was in the military I was amazed how many people could not swim at all, not the skill that amazed me the most that people could not do, but close.

My appologies for the confusion. I'm typing this on my S7 dinosaur in Tapatalk and the keyboard sometimes lags or misses letters or words. On a good note, I do have an actual computer pro looking over my laptop as I type this. I think I'm just getting a new one though.
Mine's 8 years old now.

A 40 hour certification is what I meant. Most reputable dive boats and excursions will NOT accept a diver without one of the two common certifications. They are both 40 hours with 16 hours as actual diving time and the rest able to be done digitally on a computer (that's the written test portion). Just about every dive shop I ever frequented offers some form of certification.

The second concept of mine that I believe is causing issues is the idea that having ANY LEVEL in a Skill equals competency. Nothing could be farther from the truth. A person with Familiarization in Swimming (0 level) has to roll a 10 or less just to doggie paddle (an EASY test). Add a little rough water (AVERAGE test) and now they have a 75% chance of failure. We are ALL born with the innate ability to swim, climb, walk, crawl and stand. IF you throw a newborn baby into water, that baby WILL SWIM INSTINCTIVELY. I'm not making this up. There are videos of it. HOWEVER, just because you can do something instinctively doesn't mean you'll do it WELL. Babies will learn to walk without our help but some will do it faster than others. We can all climb. We do it everyday. Some of us CANNOT CLIMB very high. Our fears limit our climbing ability. Those people in my game are the ones who get Familiarization in the FUNDAMENTAL Skills but never advance that particular Skill beyond 0 Level.

The reason that I even have FUNDAMENTAL Skills and give so many exp at the start is based on my belief that GDW games kind of "impair" a characters ability to do things in the World. Look at your own life experiences. Just how many skills have you acquired over the years? What my system does is give characters either a wide range of low level skills or fewer higher level skills. It's the player's choice how they spend their exp. My goal is to make it possible for members of a smaller group to still have overlapping skill sets. This is due to the fact that my groups usually number between 3 and 5. In RAW Twilight2000 V2.2, this won't cover every needed skill set. NPC's can fill in the gaps but I prefer having my PCs be as flexible in their skill sets as many posters in this forum are. Still, I always "hedge my bets" and have every player generate TWO PCs. The other PC is included in the group too but I just have them "doing something else" as the players take on missions from patrons. If PC #1 gets too wounded or captured, PC #2 steps up. I even have players who rotate their PCs in play. One of my players has two PCs who HATE each other and he roleplays them arguing or taking cheap shots at each other whenever they interact.