![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And hopefully neuter Russia's cruise missiles at the same time. Ukraine will be much better off if Russia can't keep terrorizing civilians with cruise missiles.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm curious what the 100+ anti-aircraft guns will end up being, since I think the last new piece of AAA adopted by the British Army was the QF 5.25-inch Mark II in 1942. There were a few prototypes of systems after that, but they introduced missiles for land-based air defense in the late 1950s and never looked back.
__________________
The poster formerly known as The Dark The Vespers War - Ninety years before the Twilight War, there was the Vespers War. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't imagine what AAA would be either unless the UK is purchasing guns from a third party to ship to Ukraine-a run of Swiss or Swedish Oerlikons? Surely nothing captured from Argentina would still be held.
Wonder if quantities of Blowpipe missiles are still in inventory that could be reconditioned and fitted with new batteries? The Blowpipe had a questionable reputation in Afghanistan but seemed perfectly good elsewhere. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If that particular term "anti-aircraft" was used by anyone in politics or media rather than the military, I could see it. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 16 (0 members and 16 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|