RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old 10-04-2011, 03:59 PM
copeab's Avatar
copeab copeab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
Oh, and you want antitank airborne capability? How about the Vespa 150 TAP?
Reminds me of the 20mm Nimbus. This Danish motorcycle had a two-man crew with a sidecar which carried a 20mm cannon. The gun couldn't be fired while on the move, but it could be fired while attached to the sidecar. It could also be removed and placed on a tripod. 60 rounds were carried. An ammunition bike carried a further 1080 rounds of ammo and two small wheels to attached to the 20mm gun to allow it to be moved short distances easily. It had some success against armored cars and light tanks during the German invasion if Denmark in 1940.
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

http://copeab.tripod.com
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:38 AM
bobcat bobcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
True, enough. But what about this forgotten step child, the M50 Ontos?

Oh, and you want antitank airborne capability? How about the Vespa 150 TAP?

i still say whoever designed that had revenge as a primary motive.
__________________
the best course of action when all is against you is to slow down and think critically about the situation. this way you are not blindly rushing into an ambush and your mind is doing something useful rather than getting you killed.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:24 AM
Rockwolf66's Avatar
Rockwolf66 Rockwolf66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
True, enough. But what about this forgotten step child, the M50 Ontos?

Oh, and you want antitank airborne capability? How about the Vespa 150 TAP?
Why am I seeing that Vespa painted pink and being ridden sidesaddle by a Japanese Scoolgirl waving a Samurai Sword?

Maybe it's because I'm working graveyard and my brain is warping.



As far as the M113 goes Imagine an ACAV model with M134 insted of M60s. I did that for one game and With the scirmish rules of that game until an RPG got the thing it was mopping the floor with ever communist revolutionary it encountered. Yes it was abusing a rule about useing Miniguns as you chose two point and drew a line between them. Anything on that like not under cover died instantly.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 10-11-2011, 04:48 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockwolf66 View Post
As far as the M113 goes Imagine an ACAV model with M134 insted of M60s.
It's been done IRL.
Australians in Vietnam played around with various weapons fittouts for their M113s and found the M134 to be total overkill on ground mounts. It was akin to firing 10 M60 machineguns all at the same point - effective yes, but a complete waste of firepower and ammunition.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:09 PM
Ronin's Avatar
Ronin Ronin is offline
Designated Marksman
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mid-Michigan DMZ
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
It's been done IRL.
Australians in Vietnam played around with various weapons fittouts for their M113s and found the M134 to be total overkill on ground mounts. It was akin to firing 10 M60 machineguns all at the same point - effective yes, but a complete waste of firepower and ammunition.
This is bad because?
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:16 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
This is bad because?
We're talking about the Australian government here, they would never allow us to spend that much money on ammunition let alone authorise us to actually use that much ammo in one engagement!
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:03 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

One Australian foot mobile infantry company went into the greatest battle in Vietnam with "first line" ammunition. That is, 60 rounds per SLR and 600 per M60 (9 total in the company).

They were attacked during a thunder storm (ruling out air support) in a rubber plantation towards the end of a several day long patrol by 2,000-3,000 NVA...

...and won.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:49 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockwolf66 View Post
Why am I seeing that Vespa painted pink and being ridden sidesaddle by a Japanese Scoolgirl waving a Samurai Sword?
I'll trade your Japanese Schoolgirl for a 21-year-old college cheerleader...
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:37 PM
Ronin's Avatar
Ronin Ronin is offline
Designated Marksman
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mid-Michigan DMZ
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
One Australian foot mobile infantry company went into the greatest battle in Vietnam with "first line" ammunition. That is, 60 rounds per SLR and 600 per M60 (9 total in the company).

They were attacked during a thunder storm (ruling out air support) in a rubber plantation towards the end of a several day long patrol by 2,000-3,000 NVA...

...and won.
60 rds per SLR? So, three 20 rd mags? Fuck your gov is a bunch of stingy bastards!
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:13 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
60 rds per SLR? So, three 20 rd mags? Fuck your gov is a bunch of stingy bastards!
Yeah that was at a time when the army higher-ups and the government thought that 60-80 rounds of .303 per SMLE was sufficient for WW2 so 60-80 rounds of 7.62mmN per L1A1 SLR would surely be sufficient.

That wasn't the biggest problem though, at that time magazines were considered to be part of the weapon and their issue was tightly controlled. Most infantry soldiers would be issued 5 mags for their L1A1 SLR but damage could mean they had only 4 or 3 to use (you'd be held accountable for the mags and expected to pay for the repair/re-issue if the damage or loss was considered to be caused by negligence).

The Battle of Long Tan to which Legbreaker is referring started out as a light patrol so most soldiers had between 3 to 5 mags for the SLR. The canny few who were able to acquire more mags were always very careful about when and where they used them because ammo was also strictly controlled and you'd be hauled over the coals to explain why you had more than your allocation.

As a result of the shitfight that Long Tan became, the army looked at the issuing of mags and ammo for wartime use and drastically changed the scale of issue. I recall that during the 1980s, infantry soldiers would likely be issued with 7 SLR mags during peacetime training but during wartime it could be as many as 11 plus they would be expected to carry extra rounds in their packs to refill their mags.
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 10-11-2011, 08:52 PM
JHart JHart is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Yeah that was at a time when the army higher-ups and the government thought that 60-80 rounds of .303 per SMLE was sufficient for WW2 so 60-80 rounds of 7.62mmN per L1A1 SLR would surely be sufficient. Yeah that was at a time when the army higher-ups and the government thought that 60-80 rounds of .303 per SMLE was sufficient for WW2 so 60-80 rounds of 7.62mmN per L1A1 SLR would surely be sufficient.
It might have been, if the VC and NVA weren't armed with Ak-47s
__________________
If you run out of fuel, become a pillbox.
If you run out of ammo, become a bunker.
If you run out of time, become a hero.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 10-11-2011, 09:33 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Some of the weapons recovered from the field the next day included carriage mounted DShKs, RPGs, grenades, numerous types of rifles, and I think if memory serves, a light mortar. This is AFTER the NVA did their usual night time cleanup.

I know one of the men who was on the ground that day (became my Battalion Padre), as well as a number of other Vietnam vets. A brave/crazy RAAF Huey pilot flew out in the storm (nearly crashed a couple of times) to drop ammo through the trees. If it hadn't been for the noise on the ground, the lightning, and thunder they'd probably have been noticed by a lot more enemy and shot down. As it was that pilot helped save the men on the ground just as they were running out of ammo.

According to the Padre, the machineguns were firing so much after resupply you could see the bullets through the barrel. All but three of the guns seized up from the heat.

A relief force of another infantry company mounted in M113s arrived around dusk after loosing several vehicles in a flooded stream. None of the vehicles at that time had an intercom system so the TC communicated with the driver through strings attached to the drivers lapels - pull on the left string to go left, etc just like a set of reigns.

When the '13s arrived the NVA were thick on the ground. The TCs were in some cases fighting hand to hand (while mounted!) and often didn't even have time to clear stoppages in their machineguns (having to switch to the coax or F1 SMG when the coax went down, or die). The vehicles themselves were used as weapons, driving over and crushing the enemy.

A nod must be given to the New Zealand MFC attached to CHQ. He walked rounds from the 105s right onto the perimeter but not one Australian was hit. He attracted accusations after the battle (from those who weren't there) that some of the Australian casualties were from artillery, however this was disproven.

The artillerymen did a damn fine job too, rapidly exhausting the ready supply of rounds. Cooks, clerks, drivers, and everyone else available lent a hand haulling additional ammo up and unpacking it for the firing line. From memory, about a thousand rounds were fired from 6(?) guns during the battle.

Due to the weather, air support was impossible. Two American jets were loitering in the area at the time and available, but could not be used on the battlefield itself. They unloaded on an area a few miles away which was later found to have been a staging area for the NVA reserve force (not included in the 2-3,000 actually on the field).

It was later found the attacking force were intending to strike at the Australian base and were strong enough to seriously threaten the entire task force of a battalion plus artillery, APCs and supporting units.

After that battle and the ammo restrictions were lifted, some soldiers had to have their packs inspected before leaving the wire to ensure they weren't just full of ammo and actually had enough food to sustain them. It wasn't uncommon for an SLR armed rifleman to be carrying several hundred rounds and each section (nine men) carrying several thousand rounds of link for the M60.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:11 PM
Schone23666's Avatar
Schone23666 Schone23666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Some of the weapons recovered from the field the next day included carriage mounted DShKs, RPGs, grenades, numerous types of rifles, and I think if memory serves, a light mortar. This is AFTER the NVA did their usual night time cleanup.

I know one of the men who was on the ground that day (became my Battalion Padre), as well as a number of other Vietnam vets. A brave/crazy RAAF Huey pilot flew out in the storm (nearly crashed a couple of times) to drop ammo through the trees. If it hadn't been for the noise on the ground, the lightning, and thunder they'd probably have been noticed by a lot more enemy and shot down. As it was that pilot helped save the men on the ground just as they were running out of ammo.

According to the Padre, the machineguns were firing so much after resupply you could see the bullets through the barrel. All but three of the guns seized up from the heat.

A relief force of another infantry company mounted in M113s arrived around dusk after loosing several vehicles in a flooded stream. None of the vehicles at that time had an intercom system so the TC communicated with the driver through strings attached to the drivers lapels - pull on the left string to go left, etc just like a set of reigns.

When the '13s arrived the NVA were thick on the ground. The TCs were in some cases fighting hand to hand (while mounted!) and often didn't even have time to clear stoppages in their machineguns (having to switch to the coax or F1 SMG when the coax went down, or die). The vehicles themselves were used as weapons, driving over and crushing the enemy.

A nod must be given to the New Zealand MFC attached to CHQ. He walked rounds from the 105s right onto the perimeter but not one Australian was hit. He attracted accusations after the battle (from those who weren't there) that some of the Australian casualties were from artillery, however this was disproven.

The artillerymen did a damn fine job too, rapidly exhausting the ready supply of rounds. Cooks, clerks, drivers, and everyone else available lent a hand haulling additional ammo up and unpacking it for the firing line. From memory, about a thousand rounds were fired from 6(?) guns during the battle.

Due to the weather, air support was impossible. Two American jets were loitering in the area at the time and available, but could not be used on the battlefield itself. They unloaded on an area a few miles away which was later found to have been a staging area for the NVA reserve force (not included in the 2-3,000 actually on the field).

It was later found the attacking force were intending to strike at the Australian base and were strong enough to seriously threaten the entire task force of a battalion plus artillery, APCs and supporting units.

After that battle and the ammo restrictions were lifted, some soldiers had to have their packs inspected before leaving the wire to ensure they weren't just full of ammo and actually had enough food to sustain them. It wasn't uncommon for an SLR armed rifleman to be carrying several hundred rounds and each section (nine men) carrying several thousand rounds of link for the M60.

Good lord, talk about a major clusterfuck and a miracle all in one.

Glad to see they carried away at least a few lessons from that.
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:15 PM
Schone23666's Avatar
Schone23666 Schone23666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
It's been done IRL.
Australians in Vietnam played around with various weapons fittouts for their M113s and found the M134 to be total overkill on ground mounts. It was akin to firing 10 M60 machineguns all at the same point - effective yes, but a complete waste of firepower and ammunition.
Didn't Dragoon500ly or SOMEONE (I cant' remember who exactly) mention one time they had the opportunity to look over an ACAV styled M113 in Iraq that had one or two miniguns mounted? He said the firepower it could bring to bear was crazy, but paid a price with the insane amount of 7.62 ammo it had to cart around, apparently they couldn't carry very much in the way of passengers other than the gunners, just a big aluminum pillbox on tracks essentially.
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:40 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schone23666 View Post
Good lord, talk about a major clusterfuck and a miracle all in one.
The only real problems were those caused by the politicians. The military managed to operate about as professionally as possible given the constraints they started the day with. Once the political cuffs were off, never again were the soldiers placed in such danger.

Of course the massive defeat the NVA suffered might have helped there. After that battle, they redirected their efforts towards the "softer" targets the Americans represented.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:40 PM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

Great account, Leg. I'm sure the Australian troops were practicing good fire discipline to make the most of their available ammunition.

When on patrol, I took 15 magazines with me. I never intended to use that many; I'm not a good marksman, but for whatever reason I have the self-control to press the trigger only on a good sight picture in close quarters combat. Too many of my comrades, however, seem to view the 3-round burst as a limit to be overcome with by trigger-pulling. In the event, I wanted to have extra ammo to cross-level.
__________________
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:58 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Speaking of the brave/crazy RAAF Huey pilot, he actually flew to the area not just during a monsoon, but right after the fire missions were sent in, flying in as rounds were impacting the target area on one or two occasions
Then he flew down to tree-top level so that they could drop ammo crates into what he hoped was the centre of the Australian position.
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 10-11-2011, 11:26 PM
Schone23666's Avatar
Schone23666 Schone23666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
Speaking of the brave/crazy RAAF Huey pilot, he actually flew to the area not just during a monsoon, but right after the fire missions were sent in, flying in as rounds were impacting the target area on one or two occasions
Then he flew down to tree-top level so that they could drop ammo crates into what he hoped was the centre of the Australian position.

I would hope they at least awarded him with SOMETHING for willing to be such a lunatic.
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
— David Drake
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 10-11-2011, 11:54 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

He wasn't alone. The RSM (Regimental Sergeant Major - outranks GOD!) was in the back, kicking out the ammo.
Another point about that particular pilot is his aircraft wasn't armed. It was only there because he'd flown in a couple of entertainers who were supposed to be putting on a show that night. Apparently the men on the ground could hear the music during brief breaks in the firefight - at least in the early stages before it became a full blown fight for survival and the show was called off.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 10-12-2011, 04:57 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
One Australian foot mobile infantry company went into the greatest battle in Vietnam with "first line" ammunition. That is, 60 rounds per SLR and 600 per M60 (9 total in the company).

They were attacked during a thunder storm (ruling out air support) in a rubber plantation towards the end of a several day long patrol by 2,000-3,000 NVA...

...and won.
I went on a huge rant on this forum about the Battle of Long Tan a year or two ago. Still has to be one of the best kill ratios of any ground battle in history.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #141  
Old 10-12-2011, 05:55 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

To me, accounts of the Battle of Long Tan should be required reading for anyone who even dreams about leading more than two men in battle. What they achieved against such overwhelming odds, and how the entire task force pulled together to do exactly what was needed of them is just inspiring.
And to have lost only 18 dead, all of which were recovered in the morning with most still in their firing positions looking over their rifles is just mind boggling considering the numbers ranged against them.

It is impossible to express the admiration and respect I have for those men, many of which were only 21 year old conscripts at the time.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 10-12-2011, 06:58 AM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
To me, accounts of the Battle of Long Tan should be required reading for anyone who even dreams about leading more than two men in battle. What they achieved against such overwhelming odds, and how the entire task force pulled together to do exactly what was needed of them is just inspiring.
And to have lost only 18 dead, all of which were recovered in the morning with most still in their firing positions looking over their rifles is just mind boggling considering the numbers ranged against them.

It is impossible to express the admiration and respect I have for those men, many of which were only 21 year old conscripts at the time.
Long Tan is included in the Vietnam series of monographs available through the Army's Center of Military History.

And a well earned salute to some damned tough Aussie bastards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 10-13-2011, 02:38 AM
HorseSoldier HorseSoldier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 846
Default

As we've sidetracked into Australian military history, was wondering if anyone has read Kokoda by Peter FitzSimmons? Next military title in my two read list.
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 10-13-2011, 04:33 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HorseSoldier View Post
As we've sidetracked into Australian military history, was wondering if anyone has read Kokoda by Peter FitzSimmons? Next military title in my two read list.
Haven't read it yet but I intend to buy a copy. I have another of his books, Tobruk (my father's father was one of the Rats of Tobruk, a New Zealand Army infantry captain). The ISBN of Tobruk, if you're interested, is 978 0 7322 8954 6 (hbk.).
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 10-13-2011, 06:47 AM
bobcat bobcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 410
Default

since we've wander into the aussy military history i might as well post this little ditty i found

We are the Anzac army,
The A.N.Z.A.C.,
We cannot shoot, we don't salute,
what good are we?
And when we go to ber-lin
The Kaiser he will say,
"Hoch, Hoch! Mein Gott; what a odd lot
To get six bob a day.

yes it was censored when i found it please don't send a kangaroo assassin after me (though one would make an awesome pet)
__________________
the best course of action when all is against you is to slow down and think critically about the situation. this way you are not blindly rushing into an ambush and your mind is doing something useful rather than getting you killed.
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 10-13-2011, 08:00 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Besides the fact it's very offensive and somewhat insulting, it's also inaccurate.
Most of the soldiers I've served with were damn fine shots (you've only got to look at Long Tan for combat evidence of that), and even the support troops know how to hit the target consistently.

I'm guessing that was WWI era German propaganda?
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 10-13-2011, 09:04 AM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

I've always thought that ditty was amusing rather than insulting.
By the accounts I've read it was composed by some Aussie or Kiwi wag during the early years of WW1 and it was sung to the tune of "The Church's One Foundation", a Christian hymn from the late 1800s.

It seems to have originated in the Dardanelles campaign although I've also seen articles that state it was during the Middle East campaign and another that claims it was from the Western Front.
In particular, the reference to "six bob a day" is peculiarly Brit/Aussi/Kiwi and is unlikely to have been understood by the Germans at the time.
Variations include "We are the ragtime army"

This piece is a typical Aussie/Kiwi case of self-mockery to mock the British attitude that the ANZACs were not good soldiers because they had little respect for military formality (and particularly the rigid British attitudes towards class/social standing). The British changed their attitudes towards the "damned colonials" by the end of that war.
As for the censoring, the removed words are that great Australian adjective 'bloody' (and no it doesn't refer to that red liquid sloshing around in your veins!)
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 10-13-2011, 09:08 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,763
Default

SSC is right. It's a song about ANZACs, by ANZACs. Nothing to get upset about. And the censorship is a waste of time. Very mild profanity there, not even all that offensive at the time (unless you were in the presence of ladies ).
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 10-13-2011, 11:41 AM
B.T.'s Avatar
B.T. B.T. is offline
Registered Kraut
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ruhrgebiet, Germany
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessSteelCynic View Post
In particular, the reference to "six bob a day" is peculiarly Brit/Aussi/Kiwi and is unlikely to have been understood by the Germans at the time.
Variations include "We are the ragtime army"
Nice to mention that fact. To be honest: I have no clue what this means. Maybe it's just me, or we Germans don't understand it after all these years.

So, anybody can help me out?
__________________
I'm from Germany ... PM me, if I was not correct. I don't want to upset anyone!

"IT'S A FREAKIN GAME, PEOPLE!"; Weswood, 5-12-2012
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 10-13-2011, 11:56 AM
simonmark6 simonmark6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Swansea, South Wales, UK
Posts: 374
Default

A bob is a shilling which equals twelve old pence. There were twenty shillings to the pound. Old money hasn't been used in the UK since, I think 1972 when we went decimal.

Another WW1 ditty that I particularly enjoy was:

I don't want to join the army,
I don't want to go to war.
Oh, I'd rather stay at home,
And from there no longer roam.
Living off the earnings of a high class whore.

Sentiments I'm sure that many of us can empathise with.

More of the old songs can be found here, some use the F-bomb.

http://faculty.buffalostate.edu/fish...ongs/les01.htm

Last edited by simonmark6; 10-13-2011 at 12:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.