#31
|
|||
|
|||
I read somewhere once that a just society would rather let ten guilty men go free rather than punish one innocent man and a tyranny would rather let ten innocent men get punished rather than let a guilty one go free. I suppose all very noble until it gets personal...
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting theory
If we postulate that France nukes the Mexican Oil Fields,
Does it not stand to reason the French would just as soon nuke the Venezuela oil as well? How about Chilean Copper Mines? I am sure the USSR took care of the Panama Canal, but just on speculation.. Of you REALLY want to crazy..... Nigerian Oil South African Diamonds Indonesian Oil If, as postulated above the French have 6 Boomers..... Say, 2 in port for R&R THat leaves 4.... One for each of the above target areas... Just a thought,,,,, My $0.02 Mike Last edited by mikeo80; 08-28-2011 at 02:52 PM. Reason: Slight spelling error |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
It's all very possible, however France might want to hold onto most of their warheads too given they're not officially at war with anyone.
Most of those targets could conceivably be targets for the actual belligerents and already be glowing by the time France feels the need to turn them into slag.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
France would only nuke targets not hit by the US, USSR, UK, or PRC. That's just a tautology. If one looks at the US, USSR, UK, and Canada target lists, the pattern seems to be predominantly command centers, refineries, industrial centers, a military facilities. Mines, like for Chilean copper, aren't very useful without an industrial center to use the copper. Ditto diamonds, since in the absence of a markets for jewelry the only other applications for diamonds are industrial. A single nuke can hit a single mine. A single nuke destroying a single city can render the productivity of whole industries inert. This is why the surgical exchange focused on EMP and refineries: they are the key stones of a modern industrial society.
__________________
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Very good points there. Take out the processing and distribution hubs and you shut everything down.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
I agree. I chime in principally when the WTF exception to the rule starts to become the rule because WTF is a) fun and b) not always understood as an exception to the rule. This idea is not always understood--especially, again, because the exceptions and the outlanding are so much fun. When I was living in Ireland (age 20-21 at the time), I was asked in all seriousness what kind of guns I had. Mind, I grew up in suburban Massachusetts. I had no guns, my family had no guns, and no one I knew hunted or talked about guns. When I told my Irish housemates that I had no guns, they asked in astonishment how I survived the daily gunfights on American streets. We Americans understand that the violence in the news represents the exceptions to the rule. Observers with no frame of reference might assume the WTF moment is the rule.
__________________
“We’re not innovating. We’re selectively imitating.” June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|