RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-18-2019, 03:13 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Marana, AZ
Posts: 2,648
Default Everything Old is New Again

So it looks like the U.S. Army's taking another look at the German Puma IFV as potential Bradley replacement.

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone...cted-years-ago
__________________
Dulce bellum inexpertis. - Erasmus
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-20-2019, 01:16 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raellus View Post

The Soviets developed canon-launched ATGMs to out-range NATO tank guns.
The Soviets developed cannon-launched ATGM because, due to poor aiming mechanisms, optics, computers, and stabilization, their long-range gun accuracy sucks.
__________________
How did the universe get so weird? -- Michio Kaku

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-20-2019, 07:25 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 1,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
The Soviets developed cannon-launched ATGM because, due to poor aiming mechanisms, optics, computers, and stabilization, their long-range gun accuracy sucks.
All that plus their ammunition simply did not have the range of comparable Western gun/ammo. I've mentioned elsewhere that their metallurgy wasn't as capable as in the West and one aspect of that was that their tank guns could not reach the same chamber pressures as Western tank guns. The consequence of that was lesser range compared to similar Western tank rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-24-2019, 11:48 PM
Panther Al's Avatar
Panther Al Panther Al is offline
Sabre Ready!
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DC Area
Posts: 841
Send a message via AIM to Panther Al
Default

For what it is worth, when it comes to Bradley replacements I wouldn't hold my breath. The way the procurement process is set up these days, they will never be able to get a program all the way through before becoming an over budget disaster.

That said, over the last few years, more than a few CV90's have been seen running around various testing grounds here in the US.
__________________
Never use finesse when force works.

Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon.

Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-31-2019, 08:36 PM
swaghauler swaghauler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 949
Default

Considering how long we kept the M113 in "mothballs," I won't moan the "loss" of the Bradley just yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.