|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is Your Favorite T2K-era APC/IFV | |||
| M2 Bradley |
   
|
21 | 22.34% |
| Warrior |
  
|
5 | 5.32% |
| Marder IFV |
  
|
6 | 6.38% |
| BMP series (Please specify which version in thread) |
  
|
4 | 4.26% |
| M113 series |
  
|
9 | 9.57% |
| AMX-10 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| LAV-25 |
|
38 | 40.43% |
| Bison |
|
1 | 1.06% |
| BTR series |
|
3 | 3.19% |
| VAB |
|
0 | 0% |
| OT-64/SKOT |
|
1 | 1.06% |
| Other (Please specify in thread) |
|
6 | 6.38% |
| CV90 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
01-22-2011, 07:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Hrm, I agree that if you had but one vehicle, an APC would be better than and IFV for no other reason than beeing able to tote stuff around.
As far as IFV's go, I had a thought, if you had to pick the penultimate IFV, then the Merkava would qualify!  High Firepower, High Protection, High Mobility, and only average troop capacity.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon. Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series. 
|
|
#2
01-22-2011, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know it always made me wonder with the adoption of the the Stryker Vehicle system. Why they went with Platoons with only basic Stryker, and not mix the platoon with 2 of the conventional Stryker and the other two with more of LAV-25 set up. Giving the platoon better fire-power.
Granted the Merkava and their APC version would make a great team. Adding two of the APC version with platoon of Merkava with dismounts would give you a full dismount infantry platoon.
|
|
| Tags |
| polls |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
