|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I don't have the module so am not party to all of the details of available equipment, etc. But I do work for an engineering consulting company that conducts this type of survey for civil and archeology applications.
There are other options for this type of survey (this includes magnetic, GPR and LIDAR). For those difficult to access areas, we've used a mountain bike. More recently, the use of drones has saved massive amounts of time and money for surveys. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Venting shouldn't be that much of a problem, Morrow normally just use Nitrogen to store their bases. So to make it breathable you just have to add Oxygen to make a 80(nitrogen)/20(oxygen) mix
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The base might have an "oxygen remover" as part of the environmental system -- it can thus "self-store", instead of requiring vast amounts of nitrogen to be provided every time it's opened for re-stocking. Perhaps before the Atomic War there was a terminal connection aboveground, as part of the now-missing elevator, to suppress the "pump in oxygen" reflex. I was more impressed/concerned about the speed with which the base transformed from "static/inactive" to "ready to walk around in". SPOILER I suppose the excess nitrogen could be vented underwater (it is a coastal base, after all). -- Michael B. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
https://soundcloud.com/user-494087291
I mentioned this excellent resource else where, but there's a few episodes on the UK's plan to use converted car ferries as floating bunkers. I wonder if the project would think of something similar? Would this be a logical extension of some of the elements in Daedolos? https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...lear-planning/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Floating bases were talked about in a different thread. There is a company that will make a luxury yacht that is basically an artificial island build on a SWATH style hull. I don't think any consensus was reached.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
http://www.shipbucket.com/drawings/7048 The old Shipbucket forum had a detailed description of the crew, weapons, sensors, etc. ... they're recently re-mixed everything and the old forum pages don't seem to be around. Our Classic-era campaign has quick-and-easy conversions of T-2 tankers (they were turbine-electric vessels, and low cost in the early 1980s) rather than a built-from-the-ground-up design. http://asmrb.pbworks.com/w/page/5264...uction%20Fleet The tanker conversion description is based on the vehicle transport vessels built for the government in the late 1960s (from earlier conversions to railcar carriers). https://www.t2tanker.org/ships/t2active.html https://www.t2tanker.org/ships/t2convstory.html The "Lewis B. Puller" is sorta similar, though perhaps a bit too blatant for the Morrow Project to get away with: https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/ho...pte-1658743256 -- Michael B. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I was fascinated by what a simple idea it was, like Airforce 1 but a fraction of the cost and you could stay at see for weeks (well years with a fusion drive). In the UK it seemed to have beaten this whole fear following the Nuclear Scientists debacle that all of the ROTOR shelters would have been anhiliated on day one. And as such three converted car ferries became the biggest secret in the Nuclear War plan.
Of course the other thing is the amount of work that went into these floating bunkers was pretty minimal. So it's not impossible another corporation or even national guard could have done their own conversions. Now I think about it Russia has some truly monsterous nuclear powered ice breakers and their fuel would last for decades. So maybe out there is the remenants of the Russian Navy prowling the Atlantic? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclea...red_icebreaker |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|