RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2020, 04:55 PM
3catcircus 3catcircus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 48
Default Expanding T2013's Careers and Starting Equipment

So I've been going through an exercise to redo the layout of Twilight:2013, rearranging the sections of the book to flow better - such as moving the life paths and character generation section before the skills, pulling the equipment section before the combat section, etc. It's pretty much just a cut and paste job between pdf and Word, but in doing so, I'm looking at some areas of concern.

I'd like to better differentiate Assault Infantry - are these Mountain, Airborne, Mechanized - and how to indicate as such? The Special Ops life paths are too difficult to qualify for - in real life, there are plenty of soldiers wearing Ranger tabs, but the prereqs make it look like your character needs to be an olympic athlete with genius level IQ.

I'm thinking of taking V2.2s careers and formalizing an equivalent first career pass in T2013 - for examples, if you take the skill levels in Assault Infantry, and designate specific levels in specific skills, it is a standard Mech Infantry vs Airborne vs Mountain, etc. I also like the idea of converting the v2.2 prereqs for T2013, but bumping then up to reflect the max starting attributes being one higher than in v2.2.

Thoughts and recommendations?

Also, any recommendations on a list of standard personal equipment by nationality? I'm having difficulty finding what is standard issue kit...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2020, 05:21 PM
Milano Milano is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California, Unided States
Posts: 49
Default

I am still hoping to recreate some of the small arms in tw2013. Might anyone have any leads on the math behind them?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:56 PM
Tegyrius's Avatar
Tegyrius Tegyrius is offline
Homeland Security LARPer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milano View Post
I am still hoping to recreate some of the small arms in tw2013. Might anyone have any leads on the math behind them?


http://www.de-fenestra.com/t2k/ballistics.html

All credit goes to Justin Stodola (user Spoe on this forum).

- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver Somebody Else's Problem

Find my Twilight: 2000 fan material and Twilight: 2013 unofficial support here, and my published sourcebook, The Pacific Northwest, here.

Enhance your enjoyment of the forum here.

If you dislike change, you're going to dislike irrelevance even more.
- General Eric Shinseki
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2020, 10:33 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3catcircus View Post
The Special Ops life paths are too difficult to qualify for - in real life, there are plenty of soldiers wearing Ranger tabs, but the prereqs make it look like your character needs to be an olympic athlete with genius level IQ.

..
In a way, it's sort of realistic, in a way it's not. In my Airborne class, we lost over 30%. In Ranger School, we lost close to 50%. Even in Infantry OSUT, we started out with 250 recruits and graduated 197 Infantrymen.

I've never tried it, but loss rate for Delta and DEVGRU candidates is around 90%.

The Commander of the WWII OSS (which spawned both the CIA and SF), COL Bill Donovan, once said, "I'm looking for a Princeton graduate who can win a bar fight -- and not get caught afterwards."
__________________
Don't get killed. That's the other guys' job. -- Isaac Arthur

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com

Last edited by pmulcahy11b; 12-31-2020 at 10:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:58 PM
3catcircus 3catcircus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
In a way, it's sort of realistic, in a way it's not. In my Airborne class, we lost over 30%. In Ranger School, we lost close to 50%. Even in Infantry OSUT, we started out with 250 recruits and graduated 197 Infantrymen.

I've never tried it, but loss rate for Delta and DEVGRU candidates is around 90%.

The Commander of the WWII OSS (which spawned both the CIA and SF), COL Bill Donovan, once said, "I'm looking for a Princeton graduate who can win a bar fight -- and not get caught afterwards."
The issue is that the granularity of the careers doesn't distinguish between the equivalent of, say, earning a Ranger tab and being assigned to a special operations-capable unit doing high speed low drag stuff.

I would argue that simulating getting a Ranger tab wouldn't be part of the Special Ops careers. Not taking away the difficulty of Ranger School, but I assume that the "Special Operations Training" career is intended to simulate RASP, SFQC, BUD/S, etc. And "Elite Infantry" would simulate 75th Ranger Rgt, SF, SEALs, etc. It reads like it leads to one of the 18 series SF MOS.

The question becomes then, how do the "Assault Infantry" and "Naval Infantry" fall into the picture. TW2013s rules sort of imply that Assault Infantry could be anything from mechanized infantry 11Bs to 82nd Airborne to 10th Mtn or anything in between. Naval Infantry reads like USMC -or- SEALs.

There's just too little info in the TW2013 career descriptions to be able to fully define which types of unit the various careers are actually trying to simulate.

That, and the careers don't really do a good job (in any edition of the game) of simulating the initial training and qualification - whether 3-week long Airborne school, 62-day Ranger School, Nuclear Power training pipeline (18 months of a million dollar education shoved down my throat a nickel at a time...), or the old 4 week navy apprenticeship training school immediately after boot camp.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2021, 08:58 AM
Milano Milano is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California, Unided States
Posts: 49
Default

@ Tegyrius ---- YOU ARE MY HERO!! I've been looking for something, anything, for years! Thank you for giving me\us this.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2021, 04:45 PM
Milano Milano is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California, Unided States
Posts: 49
Default

After playing with the formula some can I verify the variables with you?

gr = is the Grain weight of the bullet

ft / s= is feet a second of the bullet art that range. (I realize this is dependent upon BCs etc)

d = damage

r = radius of the bullet

mv = muzzle velocity in ft/sec

e = no idea!


Might there also be any formulas for Range, Spd, Recoil and Bulk ? Thank you very much for any information you may be able to share or directions to point me.

I also REALLY like your website and the encounter generator. Thank you for that as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2021, 05:54 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,358
Default

e is probably "energy" but I'll admit that my knowledge of shorthand for scientific notation is very limited.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.