|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Odd Tangent to General Chauvinism
It seems women are only used as combat troops in communist countries, third world shit holes, or last ditch efforts. I could only see women in the U.S.A. being used this way in a last ditch effort only. Mostly, I think they would be kept state side fighting invaders. I don't like how Twilight made it were women where in all the combat roles just like men from the start. It's very unrealistic that way. I could see where they are in a supply unit or something and end up being used as warriors on the front, but not joining the military with a combat MOS.
Last edited by waiting4something; 03-09-2010 at 01:04 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Wait that doesn't belong in this thread. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
To me Israel may not be third world, but it is a shit hole. Israel is a defense force meaning they have to use everyone they can, because all they're neighbors hate and want to kill them. France, I never knew that about them. They must be waiting for the next Joan of Arch? New Zealand, aren't they really just a piece of Australia?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As far as accepting the desperation argument for Israel i do. Last edited by kato13; 03-09-2010 at 01:29 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah I hear you. It's politically correct to not say things like I did, but it is what it is. I mean sure they are not barbarians, but the country is always getting bombed, having roits, people shot up by well armed and funded militants, missiles shot into it, people kidnapped by terror cells living blantantly right next to them, and living in a state of high threat for apparent reasons. Sounds like a place you wanna bring up a family..... ahhhh no. I don't mean to get off topic, I just had to tell why it is a shit hole.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
In your opinion. That is a very important factor in all internet forums. Opinions should not be stated as facts.
If Israel is a "Shit hole" then IMO more than 3/4s of the world's population live in areas that could be classified that way. Once you get to those kind of numbers the classification becomes meaningless. As far as the potential for violence, death by armed militia or by cholera or malaria each leave you just as dead. But diseases kills in far larger numbers so their presence helps me rank where I would want to raise a family. Last edited by kato13; 03-09-2010 at 01:42 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
No. But don't take my word for it. Go find yourself a Maori, walk up to him with a big cheesy grin on your face and ask the same question. Then when you've been released from hospital let me know what he said.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I mean really look at the two countries. The are so damn simular it's uncanny. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Just a touch this side of insulting!
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Maori The Maori are culturally inclined to be a warrior race. They are one of the few native peoples to have fought the British Army to a standstill during the 19th century. At one time during the Maori Wars there were around 100,000 British redcoats fighting between 5000 and 10,000 Maori warriors (and the Maori fighters were only part-time soldiers as they still had to return to their villages for the harvests). In the end the British Army only conquered the Maori by marching on their villages one by one and burning everything to the ground. Under the Treaty of Waitangi signed between the British Crown and the Maori, the Maori became full British citizens. The Maori have always been enthusiastic members of the New Zealand Armed Forces and also enthusiastic rugby players (they tend to treat rugby as a form of ritualised warfare). I am a New Zealander, although I also hold Australian citizenship. I happily regard myself as both Australian and New Zealander but many if not most New Zealanders would be horribly insulted at the suggestion that New Zealand is simply a part of Australia. Canada, Mexico and the USA all occupy the same land mass but I would never suggest that they are all the same country. New Zealand and Australia are separated by a significant stretch of water and are geographically very disimilar. I concede however that the white Australian and white New Zealand cultures are similar.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|