RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2011, 01:34 PM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default OpOrd Omega Q's

Is there any definitive word on who issued Omega? I'm guessing it's MilGov?

Why is it outlined that so many units refuse the order? Alignment with the other half of the government? E.g., they don't recognize the legitimacy of either MilGov or CivGov or is it just pure apathy or what?

Rough numbers shows me about 300 AFVs of various types (which I guess would range from improvised-armor gun trucks up to brand-new (as far as anyone in theater is concerned) M1E1s in the hands of USAEUR). If the ratio has stayed roughly the same throughout the war, this means the Bundeswehr has approximately 40 AFVs left (and the trade-for-fuel leaving them all US vehicles will be an enormous shot in the arm, with one of the most "mechanized" armies in Central Europe on a man-to-vehicle ratio). Is this about right?

Any indication on what portion of evacuated troops are taken to the RDF area of operations?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2011, 05:16 PM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

It seems to me that the refusal of many US units to report for OMEGA reflects the general disintegration of the civilization. Units that opt to stay in Germany have decided that they have a better chance of survival by holding onto what they have built for themselves in Europe than they do by giving up their heavy equipment and returning to the US. Many units no longer are willing to accept orders because the government can do little for them or little to them. Supplies are procured locally, and geopolitical concerns have fallen by the wayside, for the most part. Obviously, not everyone feels this way. However, I think it fits with the world that GDW created to have some American formations putting down roots in Germany.

I can't comment on the numbers of AFV.

I seem to recall that about 6,000 US troops from Europe are sent to CENTCOM.


Webstral
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2011, 07:02 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
It seems to me that the refusal of many US units to report for OMEGA reflects the general disintegration of the civilization. Units that opt to stay in Germany have decided that they have a better chance of survival by holding onto what they have built for themselves in Europe than they do by giving up their heavy equipment and returning to the US. Many units no longer are willing to accept orders because the government can do little for them or little to them. Supplies are procured locally, and geopolitical concerns have fallen by the wayside, for the most part. Obviously, not everyone feels this way. However, I think it fits with the world that GDW created to have some American formations putting down roots in Germany.
+1

As for AFV numbers, the numbers given in canon represent MBTs only*. So, if "Going Home" lists a division with 5 AFVs, that means 5 MBTs. You can add IFVs, APCs, etc. to that number as you see fit.

As a rule of thumb, as of 2000, I would say that for every MBT an armored or mechanized unit has, it would have 3-5 IFVs/APCs. Infantry divisions would have maybe 0-1 per MBT. Does this sound reasonable to everyone?

In order to determine how many MBTs the U.S. is ceding to German control, just tally up the number of AFVs listed for units that are evacuating. If you have Going Home, this shouldn't be too hard (it'll probably be pretty time-consuming, though).

*The U.S. Army Vehicle Guide says AFV numbers given are "to the nearest tank or assault gun" (p.2). For assault gun, I'm assuming they were referring to the LAV-75.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

Last edited by Raellus; 03-28-2011 at 07:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2011, 07:32 PM
Abbott Shaull Abbott Shaull is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Eastern U.P. on the edge of Civilization.
Posts: 1,086
Default

Honestly many of the units realized once they got to the States they would either be sent to Mexico or release from duty. While the vast majority would be left to find their way to where ever home will be in the future. So to some units they were better off and much better shape to stay in place. Also remember around the 4th US Army their were still hostile force on the other side that wouldn't mind filling a void left by the US units leaving...

Just some thought.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2011, 08:02 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Wink

It was absolutely Milgov behind the order - Civgov only holds sway in the former Yugoslavia (although there are a few rare exceptions), due to them raising and sending units there later in the war in an effort to show they still could (politics! ).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raellus View Post
As a rule of thumb, as of 2000, I would say that for every MBT an armored or mechanized unit has, it would have 3-5 IFVs/APCs. Infantry divisions would have maybe 0-1 per MBT. Does this sound reasonable to everyone?
I'd put a higher number of APCs and other light armour in an Infantry (mechanised) unit as a ratio to MBTs. Probably anything up to 10 light AFVs to each MBT (they started with less tanks and are likely to have not been put up against enemy armour as much as an Armoured Division).
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2011, 06:25 AM
Tegyrius's Avatar
Tegyrius Tegyrius is offline
This Sourcebook Kills Fascists
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raellus View Post
*The U.S. Army Vehicle Guide says AFV numbers given are "to the nearest tank or assault gun" (p.2). For assault gun, I'm assuming they were referring to the LAV-75.
I think the Stingray and Sheridan might fit that category too.

- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996

Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog.

It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
- Josh Olson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2011, 02:03 PM
Abbott Shaull Abbott Shaull is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Eastern U.P. on the edge of Civilization.
Posts: 1,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tegyrius View Post
I think the Stingray and Sheridan might fit that category too.

- C.
The CEV 728s were included in these numbers too. Yet yeah, depending on the unit, if it was Light Infantry or National Guard/Reserve Infantry Division they would tend to have few APCs, IFVs, ACCVs, and CFVs. While the other Divisions would tend to have few more. Hard to pin hard numbers because every unit would of been in different shape after 1998/1999 or so and some vehicles would no longer be operational for this reason or another...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:00 PM
HorseSoldier HorseSoldier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 846
Default

And similar foreign equivalents, since the same logic applies to everyone's force summaries.

The Bundeswehr's AFV strength is outlined in the NATO Vehicle Guide though it is lacking German reserves/National Guard equivalents.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:08 PM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tegyrius View Post
I think the Stingray and Sheridan might fit that category too.

- C.
In the USAVG, there are a couple of formations that include CEV in their AFV totals. But both of these are in the US, and none of the overseas formations mention CEVs at all...
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2011, 06:11 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragoon500ly View Post
In the USAVG, there are a couple of formations that include CEV in their AFV totals. But both of these are in the US, and none of the overseas formations mention CEVs at all...
I think they're Civgov units too aren't they?
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:06 PM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
It seems to me that the refusal of many US units to report for OMEGA reflects the general disintegration of the civilization. Units that opt to stay in Germany have decided that they have a better chance of survival by holding onto what they have built for themselves in Europe than they do by giving up their heavy equipment and returning to the US. Many units no longer are willing to accept orders because the government can do little for them or little to them. Supplies are procured locally, and geopolitical concerns have fallen by the wayside, for the most part. Obviously, not everyone feels this way. However, I think it fits with the world that GDW created to have some American formations putting down roots in Germany.

I can't comment on the numbers of AFV.

I seem to recall that about 6,000 US troops from Europe are sent to CENTCOM.


Webstral
You are correct, the RDF Sourcebook quotes the 6,000 figure as incoming personnel.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.