|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is Your Favorite T2K-era APC/IFV | |||
| M2 Bradley |
   
|
25 | 24.75% |
| Warrior |
  
|
5 | 4.95% |
| Marder IFV |
  
|
6 | 5.94% |
| BMP series (Please specify which version in thread) |
  
|
4 | 3.96% |
| M113 series |
  
|
10 | 9.90% |
| AMX-10 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| LAV-25 |
|
40 | 39.60% |
| Bison |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| BTR series |
|
3 | 2.97% |
| VAB |
|
0 | 0% |
| OT-64/SKOT |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| Other (Please specify in thread) |
|
6 | 5.94% |
| CV90 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
01-22-2011, 07:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
You mean the Merkava? Yes, about the same, but recall that the Merkava still retains all its abilities as a main battle tank while doing so. Just the ammo load is dropped to 24 rounds. The Namer, based on a turretless Merkava I've heard holds around 10, though I have seen reports saying a little more and a little less. But the Namer isn't an IFV, its (A one hell of) an APC.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon. Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series. 
|
| Tags |
| polls |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode