|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is Your Favorite T2K-era APC/IFV | |||
| M2 Bradley |
   
|
25 | 24.75% |
| Warrior |
  
|
5 | 4.95% |
| Marder IFV |
  
|
6 | 5.94% |
| BMP series (Please specify which version in thread) |
  
|
4 | 3.96% |
| M113 series |
  
|
10 | 9.90% |
| AMX-10 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| LAV-25 |
|
40 | 39.60% |
| Bison |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| BTR series |
|
3 | 2.97% |
| VAB |
|
0 | 0% |
| OT-64/SKOT |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| Other (Please specify in thread) |
|
6 | 5.94% |
| CV90 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
01-22-2011, 10:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
It's worth noting that just because a vehicle has an official passenger capacity of say 8, it doesn't mean that's all it can carry.
I've personally been sardined in the back of a buttoned Australian M113 with 14 men (plus 2 crew) including packs. Note that with the addition of the commanders turret, the rated capacity is only 9 passengers. It wasn't all that comfortable, but still better than walking. To give you an idea of how tight it was, consider that approximately 2 packs take up about the same space as a person. Now consider cramming 20 people into a small car....
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem 
|
| Tags |
| polls |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode