#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT: German vs Allied Tech in WW2
This thread was inspired by a post in the thread "In defence of the Red Army" by 95th Rifleman, which I partly disagree with:
Quote:
In the example of aircraft: Germany began WW2 with what appeared to be an unbeatable air force, yet within a year was beaten comprehensively by a smaller opponent. On paper Germany had superior aircraft, yet a combination of rapid technical innovation (eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Shilling's_orifice ) and greatly superior command and control completely negated their advantages. Later in the war, both Germany and Britain built jet fighters. The ME262 suffered from 2 problems- the first was Hitler's asinine idea that it should be a bomber. The second, lesser known, was that the engines kept failing- for many months in service over 50% of missions had to be aborted because of (non-combat) engine failures. The British jet engine, on the other hand, was a lower-tech device with a centrifugal compressor- which at the time was a much more practical engine because there was one large casting, instead of dozens of fragile compressor blades. The Panzerfaust and Panzerschrek were based (with improvements) on Bazookas captured from the Soviets [source: Modern Small Arms, by Frederick Myatt MC]: fair point about the joke though! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|