![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is my understanding that very little large scale movement occured between approximately Christmas 1997 and the offensive of 2000. This can be explained by several important factors.
Firstly the extended period of sustained nuclear attacks by both sides virtually smashed any logisitical train the various armies had been relying on. Without fuel, they wouldn't be going anywhere, especially for the more mechanised western forces. It would likely take some time for the realisation that the supply situation had dramatically and irreversably changed to sink in. It would take even longer for the units to adapt to the new situation and develop new systems, proceedures, and even technology (such as alcohol production and usage). With the almost total destruction of prewar infrastructure, and the sudden pressing need for military units to be diverted to disaster relief and civil order missions, all the while trying to keep enough soldiers on the line to prevent successful enemy attack, there'd be very few people available to implement the necessary changes. Once things settled down and there were less refugees to deal with (winter was harsh after all and summer wasn't much better with all the pandemics), focus could be shifted to the war effort once more. A reasonable estimate might be no less than 6 months from the last 1997 nuclear attacks to this stage. And then there was another nuclear exchange, once more throwing the world into a panic.... So, it could be argued that recovery and adaption was unable to begin until spring of 1999. Throughout this year, only small scale raids took place, mainly one would think to secure vital resources in preparation for the following years offensives. So, bearing in mind the upheaval after the nukes, and just how slow and torturous recovery might have been, it's quite conceivable units much bigger than a few hundred men, and certainly armoured units, remained in the same positions they'd been in at the beginning of 1998. The positions shown in Going Home aren't particularly relevant to Christmas 1999 as by then reorganisation had been virtually completed. There'd also been a massive offensive and counteroffensive as well as the call for US troops to withdraw from Europe. Massive changes in unit dispositions would both be necessary, and for almost the first time in years, possible.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Canon has a few offensives in 1998.
(quotes from V1 Referee's Manual) Quote:
1999 was pretty quiet. Quote:
Last edited by kato13; 07-08-2009 at 11:35 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
"However, all the valiant spirit in the world cannot make up for a lack of heavy artillery." |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That battle took place during the initial NATO drive eastward just before the nukes were first used.
It wasn't until a little later that the engineers placed the nuclear demolition charge flattening what little was left standing after the seige. I'd forgotten about the Pact offensives of 1998. Makes a lot of sense though when you consider their offensive doctrine. They would also probably be able to adapt a lot quicker than western armies with the sudden lack of fuel and general supply.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Compared to the previous year, the distances involved were negligable - in 1996-97 the war raged across almost all of Europe. In 1998, offensives stalled after moving just a stones throw or two... (in comparison).
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depending on when we see new stuff from the DC group, I might map out several canon paragraphs which describe unit movements (similar to the ones above). I plan to do something similar with the DC groups final data and it might be a useful test run. Of course the lack of complete data will make them pretty generic.
I'll look over the "Death of a Division" handout and see what I can do with that as it has really nice details. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon Mexican Locations. | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 12 | 12-04-2022 03:58 PM |
Nuclear Winter vs Global Warming. | Cdnwolf | Twilight 2000 Forum | 10 | 06-26-2009 01:02 PM |
Locations | General Pain | Twilight 2000 Forum | 2 | 03-24-2009 02:15 AM |
GLOBAL CW Locations | General Pain | Twilight 2000 Forum | 3 | 03-21-2009 07:26 AM |
North California Locations | General Pain | Twilight 2000 Forum | 18 | 03-19-2009 09:20 AM |