RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-12-2009, 06:16 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

My thoughts are that unless you've got a LOT of time AND explosives available, the piers aren't worth troubling with. Build to withstand not just the weight of the bridge, but flood waters as well, unless they've been constructed with demolition chambers built in, they're not going anywhere in this lifetime...
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2009, 06:20 PM
jester jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Equaly at home in the water, the mountains and the desert.
Posts: 919
Default

I mean the steel structure above the piers, the piers or pillings are usualy concrete, and the footing of the bridge is usualy steel imbeded into the concrete. Where they merge however, you have to different materials joined, and that is usualy the weak spot. A meter or so up and you have all those stresses. The charge on the concrete pilling is more to cause a shacking of the bridge once its been damaged to help loosing up what has already been damaged or weakened by the prior explosives so that gravity can do its job.

Also, look at places where a steel pole is imbeded into concrete, there is always rust on the steel, again a weak spot that should be checked and exploited.
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2009, 08:07 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,354
Default

Think about the Paul Doumer Bridge in North Vietnam. I'll grant you, it's not the same in situation or size (2500 feet cantilever construction), only analogous -- but the US repeatedly tried to drop that bridge and succeeded only in 1972 when smart bombs became available -- and then only put it out of service for a year.

I'm just saying -- it's never as easy as one thinks. That old military axiom, "No plan survives first contact."
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2009, 09:39 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,758
Default

I like Jester's idea of cutting through the steel support beams with thermite grenades. Most load-bearing points on a bridge like that will be too thick to cut through with det cord (if it was a suspension bridge det cord would be a viable option).
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2009, 10:06 PM
kato13's Avatar
kato13 kato13 is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il USA
Posts: 3,751
Send a message via ICQ to kato13
Default



This took 75 lbs or RDX and 350 shaped charges. Kinda beyond the scope of the mission but it is a pretty picture.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-2009, 10:46 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kato13
This took 75 lbs or RDX and 350 shaped charges. Kinda beyond the scope of the mission but it is a pretty picture.
Is that the former Skyway in Tampa?
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:07 AM
kato13's Avatar
kato13 kato13 is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il USA
Posts: 3,751
Send a message via ICQ to kato13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b
Is that the former Skyway in Tampa?
Jamestown Bridge in Rhode Island
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-13-2009, 07:54 PM
jester jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Equaly at home in the water, the mountains and the desert.
Posts: 919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kato13


This took 75 lbs or RDX and 350 shaped charges. Kinda beyond the scope of the mission but it is a pretty picture.

But, I see three different secontions falling in the photo. So, what if you just wanted to drop 1 section? That is all I propose, drop a wide enough section to make it beyond use.


Unless there is damn upriver where a esxplosives genious and a mountainclimber turned explorer can blow which will release a torrent of water that will take out the brigde. If that's the case then the problem is solved.
__________________
"God bless America, the land of the free, but only so long as it remains the home of the brave."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-13-2009, 09:15 PM
Grimace Grimace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 288
Send a message via ICQ to Grimace Send a message via AIM to Grimace Send a message via Yahoo to Grimace
Default

Make sure you all wave to the nice FBI agents reading this page!

As far as taking down the bridge, your best bet would be to damage one of the main supports enough with all the explosives you can that it weakens the bridge. Then, like smokewolf suggested, you let the enemy run their convoy on to the bridge and let it collapse from the weight upon the weakened section. Thus topples the section of bridge while inflicting losses upon the enemy convoy.

You can plan all you want, but trying to run a covert op against a bridge like that, without having access to all of the nifty gadgets, gizmos and extractions equipment necessary for proper insertion and extraction will result in a big hairy mess that leave any major plans largely undone.

Make it quick, make it simple, and throw all your explosives at one major point in hopes of successfully weakening the main support structure of the bridge enough that weight and/or nature will bring it down. If you're real lucky, or have more explosives than I think you could probably, reasonably have in Twilight, then you might just be able to drop a section of the bridge right away. It won't be pretty, it won't be quiet, but if you just want something "blowed up", you throw enough explosives at it and it'll drop.

Oh, and it would also help out in a major way if you've got either a civil engineer or a very, very good combat engineer who can pinpoint the exact points, the minimal exact points, that would be best to plant the explosives to cause the greatest weakening effect on the bridge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.