Combat realism?

[kcdusk]

I think a T2K party would be more aggressive. A T2K group would pin them down from behind the wall, but then send a flanking force. The french didnt do that maybe because they had other friendlies in the area.

I dont see a T2K group firing so haphazardly. They'd be taking aimed shots.

The ROE also made it harder on the french than the T2K party.

Most of the french shots look like they were more likely to bring a bird down than hit anyone.

A T2K party might not waste ammo (like finishing off any half used clips).

The french carry as much as they can, better to have too much than too little (doesnt sound like a t2k party, unless the ref has effd up!).

Good to see communication problems between groups in a modern war (the part where they are called back to base, the officer asks "are you sure?"). Means mis-communication is much more likley in a t2k situation. This is something i always struggle with. Why cant people follow the damn plan? Why arent they moving? Why are they firing now? Thats not what we said we'd do! Why cant i get them on the radio to correct them? Thats not where they are supposed to be! This wouldnt happen in real life ....

Good little vid.