RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2010, 09:57 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,763
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Far better to leave them where they are and if possible shift the badly damaged hulk with tugs to where it can be sunk in shallow water.
You beat me to it. I've been meaning to post a similar comment since this thread started. I think that for coastal (and possibly riverine/lake) applications it would be most sensible ground the ship with the weapons in place. Or if the vessel is still marginally seaworthy just anchor (or otherwise secure) it in place. Then you can tow it to another location if operational requirements change. The vessel wouldn't need to be able to move under its own power but it would be very helpful if it still had its generators working to provide electrical and hydraulic power for turret traverse and elevation, heating, maybe even radio and radar. Just look at the situation of the USS Virginia in Satellite Down. It will probably never move again but it utterly dominates that small section of coastline (and provides electrical power for its little shore community).
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-25-2010, 01:17 AM
headquarters's Avatar
headquarters headquarters is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norways weather beaten coasts
Posts: 1,825
Default scope of the game

everyone has their own take on the scope of the game I guess.

Converting naval guns to land based systems can be done - although it is demanding in terms of resources ,personell and expertise.

The German railcar guns of huge caliber during WWII had a crew of 1300 personell all told .(Cooks,mechanicstrain engineers,guards,spotterplane,spotterplane airfield personell etc etc )

Imagine setting up 20 companies of 30-50 men instead and having them dominate an area on foot or truck or horseback.
I agree that this would take you further than one railway gun in terms of controlling the land in a "survive in the ruins " game .But in a "warlord vs warlord scrap over who owns the ruins and the villages " the railway gun would be the bang to end the squabble .So different scopes .

It might not be efficient -thats very well.
But improvising such guns to be used on land could happen .

Us Norgies did it in 1940 at Hegra fort in Mid Norway -it wasnt a 8 inch battleship naval gun though . Smaller .It did help ,but sighting and firing the thing at the unholy agressors was a pain and not very effective.

Using AA guns or smaller shipboard guns to make emplacements or "technicals" would be highly cost effective on the other hand ( imho )
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-25-2010, 02:04 AM
avantman42 avantman42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
I'm with Stainless and Avantman. Some of the smaller weapon systems might be dismountable and used on land, but the bigger guns and missiles are going to have to stay where they are.
The other point I tried to make is that the original post was specifically asking about the South of England, and the Royal Navy doesn't have any big guns on it's ships. The biggest is about 4.5"

It might be feasible to dismount a 4.5" gun, but I'd be surprised if it was worth the effort, especially when there are lots of land-based guns of at least that calibre.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Targan View Post
You beat me to it. I've been meaning to post a similar comment since this thread started. I think that for coastal (and possibly riverine/lake) applications it would be most sensible ground the ship with the weapons in place. Or if the vessel is still marginally seaworthy just anchor (or otherwise secure) it in place.
Agreed.
__________________
Russell Phillips

Twilight:2000 Resources
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-25-2010, 10:58 AM
Rainbow Six's Avatar
Rainbow Six Rainbow Six is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Targan View Post
You beat me to it. I've been meaning to post a similar comment since this thread started. I think that for coastal (and possibly riverine/lake) applications it would be most sensible ground the ship with the weapons in place. Or if the vessel is still marginally seaworthy just anchor (or otherwise secure) it in place.
That's more or less what I plan to do - anchor the ships (a Type 22 Frigate and a Type 42 Destroyer), with their 4.5 inch guns still in place, but strip off any GPMG's, M2 HMG's and 20mm oerlikon cannons and mount them on improvised gun trucks.

The gun trucks are a combination of Bedford 4 tonners, Stalwarts, and Land Rovers, all of which I've named (inspired by the gun trucks in Graebarde's 5th Dvn reorganistion document). They're being operated by the Navy, so I'm keeping with Royal Navy tradition to name everything HMS something.

So far I have three Bedfords - HMS Baldrick, HMS Bedfordshire, and USS Enterprise (latter commanded by a US Navy officer); two Stalwarts - HMS Unsinkable and HMS Stalwart; and two Land Rovers - HMS Kylie and HMS Danni. I may add one or two more (at most).
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor's Guide to the United Kingdom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-25-2010, 11:36 AM
kato13's Avatar
kato13 kato13 is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il USA
Posts: 3,767
Send a message via ICQ to kato13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Six View Post
and two Land Rovers - HMS Kylie and HMS Danni
Cute. Are land rovers known for their "legs"?

edit: I was thinking legs as in distance able to be traveled, but apparently
land-rover-engine-&-gearbox-specialists = l.e.g.s.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2010, 08:32 AM
Rainbow Six's Avatar
Rainbow Six Rainbow Six is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,624
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by kato13 View Post
Cute. Are land rovers known for their "legs"?

edit: I was thinking legs as in distance able to be traveled, but apparently
land-rover-engine-&-gearbox-specialists = l.e.g.s.
When I named the trucks I was just looking for something that was humourous in a tongue in cheek way (to me at least )

I settled on the name HMS Kylie because Kylie Minogue was a popular figure in UK culture in the 1990's, and I figured the name was something that might appeal to the average sailor stuck in the Plymouth enclave. I decided to assign it to one of the Land Rovers because the Land Rovers are the smallest of the gun trucks and Kylie Minogue is only five feet tall...

Once I'd settled on HMS Kylie, HMS Danni after Kylie's sister, just seemed kinda logical...

(I think most of the other names are fairly obvious - for those unfamiliar with British TV / culture, Baldrick was a character in the Blackadder TV series that ran in the 1980's)
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor's Guide to the United Kingdom
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2010, 08:50 AM
kato13's Avatar
kato13 kato13 is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il USA
Posts: 3,767
Send a message via ICQ to kato13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Six View Post
When I named the trucks I was just looking for something that was humourous in a tongue in cheek way (to me at least )
I like it. If I was in the unit staff I would have likely been the one to have painted their figures of each of them onto the vehicles. My art skills are always enhanced when painting the female form. Bomber nose art was an early inspiration for me.

One note I think Danni has two 'i's. Dannii Minogue

Baldrick was a nice one as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-27-2010, 11:51 AM
avantman42 avantman42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Six View Post
(I think most of the other names are fairly obvious - for those unfamiliar with British TV / culture, Baldrick was a character in the Blackadder TV series that ran in the 1980's)
You have to wonder if the crew of HMS Baldrick are known for their "cunning plans"
__________________
Russell Phillips

Twilight:2000 Resources
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-27-2010, 06:24 PM
WallShadow's Avatar
WallShadow WallShadow is offline
Ephemera of the Big Ka-Boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: near TMI
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avantman42 View Post
You have to wonder if the crew of HMS Baldrick are known for their "cunning plans"
So, when given orders to secure the "Baldrick" in its garage, the appropriate order would be, "Shut up Baldrick"?
__________________
"Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-27-2010, 07:17 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Rainbow Six, do you know that the Bovington Tank Museum has a WW1 era Rolls Royce armoured car, one of the type as used by the Royal Navy Air Service (who were the pioneers of British armoured car use)? Bovington is a bit of a hike from Portsmouth but with a small landing craft the group could sail into Poole Harbour (all the way to Holton Heath) then follow the railway line to Wool (2km from Bovington)
While other groups would probably loot as many of the modern vehicles as they could, I'm thinking they might ignore a WW1 vehicle.

I'm thinking of the irony (and the potential morale points) of the Portsmouth garrison recovering the armoured car from the museum, repainting it in RN colours and putting it to work (as it is maintained by the museum in working order for parades and ceremonial duties). Although a bit slow by modern standards, it's a very rugged design and with modern tyres would probably be quite agile (it was apparently a good performer in it's day with the tyres of that era)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
artillery, heavy weapons


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.