RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2010, 01:09 PM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waiting4something View Post
I mean the only way I could see mixing them with the Army or Marines is if units were reduced so badly from what they once had been. Also, if a total break down of command happened and people were deserting I could see that happening.
This is pretty much Twilight: 2000 in a nutshell.

Webstral
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2010, 01:20 PM
waiting4something's Avatar
waiting4something waiting4something is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: midwest, U.S.A.
Posts: 316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
This is pretty much Twilight: 2000 in a nutshell.

Webstral
Yes, you mean like a bunch of stranglers joining up like how the playing characters are. Yes, that is Twilight 2000. I was thinking of just before you get the "good luck your own your own message".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2010, 01:23 PM
Adm.Lee Adm.Lee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,387
Default

IMO, and in any campaign I run, a lot of Air Force and Navy personnel have been funneled (voluntarily, at least at first) into Army replacements. I envision a mass retraining program set up in the winter of 98-99 or 99-00 to retrain them as infantry replacements. Likely each field army and division would have its own training detachment, and then shuffle units out of the line to integrate them over time. To me, the best time to do this would be in the winter, while the formations are in cantonments-- lots of time for small-unit training and patrolling.

Any others, who don't or can't volunteer for combat-arms replacements, would get moved to support & service functions. Possibly the Army could disband its own service functions, and transfer most of the soldiers there to the combat arms, while Air Force & Navy personnel take over the base functions.

OTOH: I remember reading in the '90s that the US Air Force had nearly as many Air police & security squadrons as the Army had infantry battalions. YMMV.
__________________
My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2010, 03:06 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,354
Default

Precedent is there. Why make this more complicated? Germany's experience in the later years of WWII supports using surplus to requirements airforce and naval personel as infantry replacements. German AF and N personel were given an abbreviated basic training and then attached to a parent Volkgrenadier unit where they would participate in field excercises. Some of these men couldn't handle the relative hardships of army life and did in fact desert but the vast majority fought on, even when it was fairly obvious to all but the most fanatical Nazi that the war was lost. During the time when the Volksgrenadier units were being formed (late '44 and early '45), Germany was under constant pressure on all fronts but they were still able to reorganize many shattered infantry divisions and bulk them up with AF and N people. During the cantonment phase of the Twilight War (WWIII), there would have been plenty of "down time" to integrate AF and N people into Army units.

If you formed them into homogenous "rear security units" you would only create resentment among line army units and actually heighten intraservice rivalry.

I also think the idea that a former sailor, pilot, or aircrewman wouldn't accept or couldn't handle a transition to infantry is kind of insulting to those folks. The vast majority of soldiers, sailors, and airmen do what they are told by their superiors. Do you really think the navy and airforce would be lobbying to have their people formed into independent, homogenous rear area security (or like) units? Why? How are they going to supply them? Aside from airfield and port security, AF and N brass have little to no experience running those types of units/ops. Who's going to supply them with supplies that the army traditionally receives? Army generals are going to be bawling for replacements and someone's going to tell them that they can't have the thousands of beached sailors and grounded airmen because those groups are going to start taking traditional army missions but be placed under navy and army command. They'd be making the same deadly mistake the Germans made in WWII.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

Last edited by Raellus; 03-10-2010 at 04:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.