OT: Let me ask our British posters a strange question

[Webstral]

Originally Posted by TiggerCCW UK

We have secret classes on it in school so that we can blend in when we come over to re colonise the Americas.

I knew it! South Park was right all along! So was Burke Breathed (Bloom County) when he protrayed Prince Charles ordering the Royal Navy to "retake Massachusetts".

Truth be told, I'd be happy to have a million or more English-speaking immigrants arrive. The English learner (EL) situation in California's schools is becoming a real crisis. I don't have a problem with (legal) immigrants per se, but the system isn't set up to handle the sheer weight of EL in the public schools. California has a population of about 38 million in a nation of approximately 300 million. We'll round this to 10% of the nation's population. One third of the EL in the nation's public schools are in California. In some school districts, EL are 90% or more of the school body. Again, it is what it is. It would be nice to be able to mix in a few more native English speakers--even if their English is a bit dodgy.

Webstral

[pmulcahy11b]

Web, you should try coming here to Texas -- not only is our state the king of "teaching to the test," the Texas legislature is currently considering replacing all the history books in our schools with ones that remove whole swaths of history, putting in sections that are essentially complete bullshit, distorting other sections (did you know that McCarthy was actually right about communists in the US and that he was run out of office without justification? These clowns think so...), and in some cases, just making stuff up. This is because Texas is the state where the Tea Party runs riot and Texas is the headquarters of Right-Wing Wackos Central. Texas kids are already some of the most poorly educated in the country -- and it looks like it's just going to get worse. It's not like our kids aren't going to school -- it's that poor education methods are institutionalized in Texas.

[Webstral]

I've been following the developments in Texas education. It does not seem like a pretty picture.

The Tea Party confuses me. If the electorate doesn't like what their elected officials are doing, why not put more pressure on those officials? With the number of people flocking to the Tea Party, they easily could bury the incumbents with letters demanding a particular policy. Special interests can provide funding, but they can't provide votes. How a legislator votes on given issues is public record. Wouldn't it be simpler to hold a legislator accountable for how s/he votes than create a whole new party? If the numbers involved in the Tea Party were to sign documents representing a unified position, neither Democrat nor Republican incumbent could ignore them. "We'll vote you out" is the one message to which our elected officials really give their attention.

I understand that most republics have the same problem. We're too busy with our everyday lives to get involved in politics until things go south. Ounces of prevention...

Webstral

[pmulcahy11b]

Originally Posted by Webstral

I've been following the developments in Texas education. It does not seem like a pretty picture.

The Tea Party confuses me. If the electorate doesn't like what their elected officials are doing, why not put more pressure on those officials? With the number of people flocking to the Tea Party, they easily could bury the incumbents with letters demanding a particular policy. Special interests can provide funding, but they can't provide votes. How a legislator votes on given issues is public record. Wouldn't it be simpler to hold a legislator accountable for how s/he votes than create a whole new party? If the numbers involved in the Tea Party were to sign documents representing a unified position, neither Democrat nor Republican incumbent could ignore them. "We'll vote you out" is the one message to which our elected officials really give their attention.

I understand that most republics have the same problem. We're too busy with our everyday lives to get involved in politics until things go south. Ounces of prevention...

Webstral

Two words: "voter apathy." It's a disgrace how little of the eligible population in this country actually votes, and its a disgrace how ignorant the electorate in general is of voting issues. It's why most of those who do vote can so easily be led around by the nose by special interests and the political parties.

In his parting address to the country, George Washington warned of the danger of forming political parties. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were already forming the ancestors of the current Democratic and Republican parties. I really wish that the country had listened to him.

[Adm.Lee]

Just to defend one of my heroes

Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b

In his parting address to the country, George Washington warned of the danger of forming political parties. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were already forming the ancestors of the current Democratic and Republican parties. I really wish that the country had listened to him.

And another reason people are Tea Partying is that they are in a minority, they have griped to their Congressmen and Senators, and the stuff they don't want is happening anyway. Look at the two who were upset in their primaries this month-- Sen. Bennett was a reliable Republican, but he is being "held accountable" for being outvoted.

FWIW, political stupidity is all over, I think the GOP candidate for governor in Ohio is going to run on repealing the income tax so he can attract businesses to the state. I don't think businesses will come to a state with no schools....

[pmulcahy11b]

Originally Posted by Webstral

The Tea Party confuses me. If the electorate doesn't like what their elected officials are doing, why not put more pressure on those officials?

Like any other extremist group, the Tea Party wants to dictate what everyone's view of the world and how they live will be. Extremist groups are by definition anti-democratic (and I don't mean the party), regardless of what they say. They do not want people to form their own opinions, and a public that knows the issues is a serious threat to an extremist group.

[weswood]

Originally Posted by Webstral

The Tea Party confuses me. If the electorate doesn't like what their elected officials are doing, why not put more pressure on those officials? With the number of people flocking to the Tea Party, they easily could bury the incumbents with letters demanding a particular policy. Special interests can provide funding, but they can't provide votes. How a legislator votes on given issues is public record. Wouldn't it be simpler to hold a legislator accountable for how s/he votes than create a whole new party? If the numbers involved in the Tea Party were to sign documents representing a unified position, neither Democrat nor Republican incumbent could ignore them. "We'll vote you out" is the one message to which our elected officials really give their attention.

I understand that most republics have the same problem. We're too busy with our everyday lives to get involved in politics until things go south. Ounces of prevention...

Webstral

I think the TEA Partyis trying to let our elected reps know what they are against and for. Such as a smaller government, less taxes, etc. Yes, we can let the elected officials know by voting them in or out of office, but when the elections are held every four years, that's four years elected offials can run amok doing what they themselves want.

[pmulcahy11b]

Originally Posted by weswood

Yes, we can let the elected officials know by voting them in or out of office, but when the elections are held every four years, that's four years elected offials can run amok doing what they themselves want.

Isn't that always true? The politicians aren't really interested in the voters until the campaign gets well underway -- and then they are largely interested in mollifying them without really doing anything to hurt the special interests that give them money. That's what the BP hearings in the Senate really are right now -- they're a show for the voters. The politicians aren't really willing to bite the hand that feeds them.

[Webstral]

Originally Posted by weswood

I think the TEA Partyis trying to let our elected reps know what they are against and for. Such as a smaller government, less taxes, etc. Yes, we can let the elected officials know by voting them in or out of office, but when the elections are held every four years, that's four years elected offials can run amok doing what they themselves want.

I agree completely that the Tea Party want their message to be heard, although they seem to have trouble deciding what that message is. (What organization with more than handful of people doesn't face this problem?) We should bear in mind that the entire House of Reps is re-elected every two years. The drawback of this system is that a Rep is on the campaign trail from the moment he is sworn in until the moment the election results come in. A lot of energy is diverted to the endless campaigning. On the other hand, the feeling of vulnerability that arises from the biennial campaign cycle is something the Tea Party is hoping to exploit. Heck, everybody wants to exploit it.

Governors, of course, are elected every four years. I ought to know what the legislative cycle is in every state, but I don't. I suppose it's easy enough to look up, what with the Internet and all.

I'm guilty of encouraging a thread that is becoming political. I may not be the best moderator to moderate or make a decision about where the line is drawn. Perhaps one of the other moderators might make an assessment?

Webstral

[headquarters]

Yeah - I will give it a try :

The thread was about accents ,somehow politics got in .It seems civil enough .Anyways .The assessment :

Try to say your pieces with a New Zeeland accent .



It is WEIRD but beautiful.

They change the E with an I or some such so that the word EXIT will sound like IXIT etc .

No try to do this with the legislative measures towards which the tea party is currently protesting

Anyone from down under that feels I have misrepresented their wonderous English ,please I will take no blindfold .Just let me finish my last fag and get on with it .



( yes ,it is a joke -and Yanks ,fag is slang for a cigarette in case some of you raised an eyebrow )

[pmulcahy11b]

For some reason, I've always had this idea that Headquarters and General Pain are actually the same person. Hmmm...maybe this post belongs in the Conspiracy Theories thread...