![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Of course as New Orleans got nuked, who'd want to live the glowing metal coffin?
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well it could have been bought and moved to Mobile to be added to the USS Alabama Museum. missing the nuke and being some what restored.
and if you looking for a possible ship to use as a sea base how about the USS Gage a Haskell class Assault transport. i also have some of her deck plans as well as plans for WW2 Era LSTs' LCIs' as well as ther specs. any one interested? ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It'd be lucky to still hold water after 40 odd years sitting idle.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Actually if it's in the reserve fleet it would probably be kept in a decent state, they have a significant maintenance program to ensure the ships can be put back into service. That's not to say that every ship in the reserve fleet would be seaworthy, some of the oldest ones are getting a bit "thin in the hull"
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...y/dot/ndrf.htm What the global security writeup does infer though is that the longer a ship has be sitting in the reserve fleet, the greater the likelihood it will be scrapped or sunk (as artificial reefs) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Another thing to point is the cost of reactivation. Following 25 years of service, USS Oriskany was decommissioned on 30 September 1976 and laid up for long-term storage in Bremerton, Washington, where the carrier was maintained as a mobilization asset. Reagan Administration proposals to reactivate Oriskany were rejected by the United States Congress on the basis of the ship's poor material condition and limited air wing. The cost of reactivation was estimated at approximately $520 million for FY 1982 ($1 billion in 2010). This figure would probably more for the USS Cabot, given its age. I think the better solution would be Langley-class Escort Carriers found at Chico's site http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeedox4/ship_designs.html.
__________________
"You're damn right, I'm gonna be pissed off! I bought that pig at Pink Floyd's yard sale!" Last edited by Canadian Army; 09-22-2010 at 05:33 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your carrier may not have been available as a Naval Asset - but it could have been very useful as a prison hulk. Lots of room and nobody digs escape tunnels
Where else are you going to "warehouse" the POW population? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Writer at The Vespers War - World War I equipment for v2.2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
except for two factors on this particular light carrier
she had been in active service until 1989 and was delivered in working condition with fully serviced engines, navigation gear, etc.. - she wasnt towed into port in late 1989 she was sailed in by a full crew of Spanish sailors and she went into drydock and came out in 1993 with a fully blasted and painted hull, asbestos removed on several decks and otherwise worked on this isnt a ship thats been sitting around in the Reserve Fleet since the 1950's or Vietnam - she was flying sorties as late as August 1989 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Definitely interested in the LST stuff
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|