![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well from the US vehicle guide the 5th Mech ID started out with somewhere between 2,500 and 3,499 men and 40 abrams tanks.
It's hard to belive that only 500 men and one tank survied the battle of Kalis. I would thnk that there would be alot more survivors and from the fluff text the 5th mauled the Soviet army they fought. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maybe one of the mod's could dig up the past thread or 3 about this
__________________
"There is only one tactical principal which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." --General George S. Patton, Jr. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Total initial strength 6,600 Combat troops initial strength approx. 2,600 July 18, 0001 hrs 4,471 Combat troops July 18, 0001 hrs 973* * includes 86 survivors from 256th Brigade that fled south of Lask on July 16. So as of the final attack at Kalisz, I ended up with only about 900 "combat troops" defending Kalisz, with over 3,000 in rear area services behind them. "Combat troops" I defined as troops of the front line companies of the three brigades (i.e., not HQ/support troops from battalion, brigade or division). From this point forward, my feeling was a lot of the rear-area troops would end up surrendering (esp. to 10th Polish TD). I figured perhaps 1,500 total men (about 1/3 of July 18, 0001 strength) would get away, with perhaps one third of these being "combat troops". Draw from that what you will. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
imho every one would be a "combat troop" in a situation like the 5th found its self in. as for surrendering I don't think that would be even an option after the beating the 5th gave out. i.e. stand and die or run .
imo 500-600 men , 2-4 tanks and 20-30 assorted AFV's in small groups would have gotten out of the line of fire, as to how long they would have lasted after that day idk.
__________________
"There is only one tactical principal which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds, death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." --General George S. Patton, Jr. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We know that the Abrams of one of the brigades had nothing but fumes in their tanks and no reserve. Although they obliterated a Soviet unit on the road below, it's unlikely any of them escaped (but possible enough was scavenged to get one moving a mile or two).
I can't say if any other tanks were involved anywhere in the battle (away from books).
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() I do agree that, depending on how bloody-minded the Poles and Soviets were, a lot of 5 ID was going to depart the mortal coil on July 18... |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well having taken a look at my copy of going home. Apparently the survivors of the 5th, really do take a nasty chunk out of the 4th army.The 4th army numbers in the 2.2 rulebook are straight out of the escape from Kalis book. Going home indicates that after the battle the various soviet units take even more casualties and the remaining larger units have absorbed smaller units. The story I am working on is just after the battle of Kalis and the 5th is trying to prevent the soviets from trying to get their shit together.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From memory there's a reference in the Excape from Kalisz scenario indicating Polish and Soviet units enter into armed conflict over resources in the days immediately following the destruction of the 5th. That action is likely to have a direct impact on the Going Home numbers.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|