|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is Your Favorite T2K-era APC/IFV | |||
| M2 Bradley |
   
|
25 | 24.75% |
| Warrior |
  
|
5 | 4.95% |
| Marder IFV |
  
|
6 | 5.94% |
| BMP series (Please specify which version in thread) |
  
|
4 | 3.96% |
| M113 series |
  
|
10 | 9.90% |
| AMX-10 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| LAV-25 |
|
40 | 39.60% |
| Bison |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| BTR series |
|
3 | 2.97% |
| VAB |
|
0 | 0% |
| OT-64/SKOT |
|
1 | 0.99% |
| Other (Please specify in thread) |
|
6 | 5.94% |
| CV90 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
01-21-2011, 12:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The South African's Ratel (with its siblings the Belgian Sibmas) and second the South African Casspir.
Always found that these had a terrific look and the Casspir was 20 years well ahead of everyone else. 
|
|
#2
01-21-2011, 12:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry for the thread necromancy. I was looking back through old polls and saw I hadn't voted in it -- and forgot voting bumped the thread.
Anyway, I went with the M113. Not because it's value in combat, but because it's a simple machine (relatively speaking) that kinda floats and has decent fuel economy. Oh, and hold s a lot of people and cargo.
|
|
#3
01-21-2011, 01:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
CV90 all the way. Granted its rare in the T2K timeline, but its well protected and as a firepower level that can scare older tanks.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon. Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
|
|
#4
01-22-2011, 07:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Make mine a Marder, had a chance to run with one on a exchange tour...nice, very nice!
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
|
|
#5
01-22-2011, 09:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Didn't the Marder have a remote mini-turret dual 7.62 MGs behind their main turret?
|
|
#6
01-22-2011, 11:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
|
|
#7
01-22-2011, 11:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I do dig the Marder, though. I like it's low profile.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
|
|
#8
01-22-2011, 05:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Marder places second on my list, mainly because of its lack of carrying capacity. When they upgraded it to mount the squads MILAN, they had to kick the squad size down to 5 to make room for the missiles, which left the dismount numbers rather short. Some say they fixed that in later versions, but since I have seen some sources that say yes, and some that say no, I can't place it any higher than 2nd. Granted, troop capacity is a weakness in all IFV's, but the Marder takes it to an extreme. The upside is, is that it defines what well armoured means for IFV's.
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon. Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series.
|
|
| Tags |
| polls |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
