RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2011, 06:40 AM
perardua perardua is offline
In your own time, go on...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 136
Default

I was told by some American military personnel that the M79 is preferred for certain tasks as it's break-open loading mechanism meant it was possible to load it with longer specialty rounds which the M203 loading mechanism doesn't allow. This was in a conversation about the merits of my UGL, which is based on a German design and swings out to the side to load, again allowing for easier loading of longer rounds (if the MoD would ever come through on their promises to buy any). British UGL's also have the ladder sight attached directly to the side of the weapon, whereas I believe M203s have to be zeroed to a removeable sight attached to the M4?

I also heard that the M203 replacement will be a derivation of the same UGL system as the Germans and British use, possibly for these very reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2011, 06:46 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
I was told by some American military personnel that the M79 is preferred for certain tasks as it's break-open loading mechanism meant it was possible to load it with longer specialty rounds which the M203 loading mechanism doesn't allow.
Correct.
The M79 does have a safety though which isn't exactly in the best position - new users can rip the webbing between thumb and forefinger when firing if they're not careful. Not exactly a big thing, but worth considering from an roleplaying point.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2011, 08:35 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perardua View Post
I was told by some American military personnel that the M79 is preferred for certain tasks as it's break-open loading mechanism meant it was possible to load it with longer specialty rounds which the M203 loading mechanism doesn't allow. This was in a conversation about the merits of my UGL, which is based on a German design and swings out to the side to load, again allowing for easier loading of longer rounds (if the MoD would ever come through on their promises to buy any). British UGL's also have the ladder sight attached directly to the side of the weapon, whereas I believe M203s have to be zeroed to a removeable sight attached to the M4?
The M203PI was developed to address the issue of only being able to load certain rounds (specifically, the Illum round was too long for the earlier variant so the PI version is able to move the tube further forward to allow the Illum rounds to be loaded). However, I don't know if they are issued widely enough for all units with M203 launchers to benefit.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.